From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is emacs architecture ? Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:13:03 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20100707.150746.549331509773933118.yamato@redhat.com> <87aaq3qpo7.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <8739vvxkqr.fsf@escher.home> <8739vvoyak.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87tyoas9o4.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87iq4p6fj2.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87r5iz4jn2.fsf@telefonica.net> <930432A0-2110-4A31-88B6-BFB35D07380F@mit.edu> <87iq4azyvs.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tynuc0y6.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87d3ui4yzh.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279602855 20661 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2010 05:14:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 20 07:14:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob58z-0000MY-Nx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:14:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ob58s-00049O-Ss for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:13:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55053 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ob58j-00048z-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:13:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob58h-0006Sl-QE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:13:12 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:33511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob58d-0006Rr-54; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.184]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o6K5D4nM000804; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:13:04 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id o6K5D4I09755; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:13:04 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay41.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.9]) by vgate02.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id o6K5D4911607; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:13:04 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay61.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay41.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:13:04 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.113.207] [10.114.113.207]) by relay61.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:13:04 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id A2F6D52E225; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:13:03 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <87d3ui4yzh.fsf@telefonica.net> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=22=D3scar?= Fuentes"'s message of "Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:24:18 +0200") Original-Lines: 17 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127602 Archived-At: =D3scar Fuentes writes: >> Hmm, doesn't bzr "discourage" rebasing? > > Yes, the same way Windows' Notepad discourages customization. Don't they have a plugin to do it tho (bzr, I mean)? > (I'll emphasize the point that we are talking about local, private > rebasing before sending the changes upstream.) Exactly (which is why such "discouragement" seems odd to me). -Miles --=20 Religion, n. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable.