From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Selection changes in revno 100822 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:25:07 +0900 Message-ID: References: <834oeyv3ww.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxsqyp98.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83zkwptyij.fsf@gnu.org> <4C66660D.3090603@swipnet.se> <83sk2htp82.fsf@gnu.org> <4C66A8C5.4040203@harpegolden.net> <83hbixte8c.fsf@gnu.org> <4C66D081.908@harpegolden.net> <838w48u9fg.fsf@gnu.org> <8739ugrniw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tymvb4uv.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k4nrqe91.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k4nrj7u3.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281947130 18690 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2010 08:25:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:25:30 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 16 10:25:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Okv0a-0000pp-Tw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:25:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43793 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Okv0a-0005oW-5a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:25:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37423 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Okv0P-0005oH-5m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:25:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Okv0J-0004dU-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:25:17 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:41249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Okv0I-0004d3-Li; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.195]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o7G8P80f020085; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:25:08 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id o7G8P8F22752; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:25:08 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46]) by vgate01.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id o7G8P7L00416; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:25:07 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay51.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.20] [10.29.19.20]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:25:07 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.114.217] [10.114.114.217]) by relay51.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:25:07 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 3CAEC52E1B8; Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:25:07 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <87k4nrj7u3.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> (Manoj Srivastava's message of "Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:11:00 -0700") Original-Lines: 19 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128787 Archived-At: Manoj Srivastava writes: > As an end user, I don't know whether the highlighted text I > see goes into Primary, Secondary, or clipboard (I use X windows on a > GNU/Linux machine). I see it highlighted, and am very confused as to > why it sometimes does not yank with C-y. I find this inconsistency in > Emacs confusing. Can you try: (setq x-select-enable-clipboard t) (setq x-select-enable-primary t) They make things work better for me. -Miles -- P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false, for reasons of military security.