From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to stop find-grep-dired? Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 11:10:56 +0900 Message-ID: References: <44E5DACB.10608@student.lu.se> <44E6C066.7010008@student.lu.se> <200608210856.k7L8u2mx020108@beta.mvs.co.il> <44EA99D2.5070709@student.lu.se> <87y7t7xkpn.fsf@jurta.org> <85bqq0oi51.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87d5ag1sbt.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157076796 12127 80.91.229.2 (1 Sep 2006 02:13:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 02:13:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, ehud@unix.mvs.co.il Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 04:13:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIyWo-0006ug-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 04:13:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIyWn-0004Ie-Dz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:13:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GIyWa-0004HF-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:12:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GIyWZ-0004Ew-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:12:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIyWY-0004Ei-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:12:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [203.180.232.81] (helo=mgate01.necel.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GIygE-0000uU-Se; Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:22:51 -0400 Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com (relay31 [10.29.19.54]) by mgate01.necel.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k7VMDMGE027326; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:12:43 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.20] [10.29.19.20]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:12:43 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.97.235] [10.114.97.235]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:12:43 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 278FE3B0; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:10:56 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Juri Linkov System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <87d5ag1sbt.fsf@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:34:42 +0300") Original-Lines: 17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59199 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > Do you know why comint doesn't bind C-c C-k to comint-kill-subjob? > Are there any reasons not to do so? It's almost always the wrong thing to use, especially for a typical comint process [*], so having a handy binding by default seems like asking for trouble. [*] (1) It send SIGKILL, which is a last-ditch emergency measure, not the way you should ordinarily stop a process (2) Because it sends a _signal_, rather than using pty, it will kill the sub-shell rather than the foreground process, in the case of a shell session (not to mention a telnet session etc). -Miles -- .Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.