From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: weird desktop.el change Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:25:38 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87d52bbwro.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176279042 16511 80.91.229.12 (11 Apr 2007 08:10:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 11 10:10:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HbRap-0000xX-8l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:25:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HbReo-0003MU-Ic for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HbRel-0003MF-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:29:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HbRej-0003M3-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:29:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HbRej-0003M0-JF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HbRai-0000pp-7Z; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:25:44 -0400 Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3B1Pab9017225; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:25:39 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.20] [10.29.19.20]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:25:39 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.97.235] [10.114.97.235]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:25:39 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 096A54AB; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:25:38 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Wed\, 11 Apr 2007 02\:49\:38 +0200") Original-Lines: 16 X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69275 Archived-At: "Juanma Barranquero" writes: >> A quick glance suggests that Eli's change was correct (the return values >> of the calls to mapc/mapcar are all ignored, so using mapc seems OK), >> and does indeed avoid some consing, so why did you revert it? > > That's one of Kevin Rodgers changes that has been reverted to allow > the release to go on. Er, OK... does such a trivial and purely mechanical change really count? What if I make an equivalent change now? -Miles -- Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here, beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?