From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.fortran,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:49:09 +0900 Message-ID: References: <45462048.8020102@net-b.de> <20061030161402.15694.qmail@web81209.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <19c433eb0610300818g453bba53m241df66d86493e88@mail.gmail.com> <20061031024656.GA10094@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162266841 20860 80.91.229.2 (31 Oct 2006 03:54:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Fran?ois-Xavier Coudert , Bud Davis , Tobias Burnus , fortran@gcc.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: fortran-return-15333-gcgf-fortran=m.gmane.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Oct 31 04:53:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcgf-fortran@gmane.org Original-Received: from sourceware.org ([209.132.176.174]) by ciao.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GekhJ-0004UU-Ko for gcgf-fortran@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:53:57 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 21731 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2006 03:53:55 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 21718 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Oct 2006 03:53:55 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Original-Received: from mgate03.necel.com (HELO mgate03.necel.com) (203.180.232.83) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 03:53:51 +0000 Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com (relay11 [10.29.19.46]) by mgate03.necel.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k9V3XEhL017796; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:53:44 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.16] [10.29.19.16]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:53:44 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.97.235] [10.114.97.235]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:53:44 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 956DC5C5; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:49:09 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Steve Kargl System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <20061031024656.GA10094@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> (Steve Kargl's message of "Mon\, 30 Oct 2006 18\:46\:56 -0800") Original-Lines: 21 Mailing-List: contact fortran-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Original-Sender: fortran-owner@gcc.gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.gcc.fortran:15303 gmane.emacs.devel:61451 Archived-At: Steve Kargl writes: >> > Frankly, I strongly prefer the current error formating. > > I agree with FX. So, _every single detail_ of the current error message format is sacred? What's being suggested is a fairly minor change -- the bulk of the error messages would remain exactly the same. [Surely you recognize the worth of such standardization?] > Are you aware that gfortran can report errors that span multiple lines? All we want is enough information to get close; the first line will do in such cases. -Miles -- "Suppose He doesn't give a shit? Suppose there is a God but He just doesn't give a shit?" [George Carlin]