From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs 23.0.91 pretest
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:10:12 +0900
Message-ID: <buoskm13kkb.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
References: <87tz6i6kug.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
	<buoy6vt3nxs.fsf@dhlpc061.dev.necel.com>
	<ilbpspq2fn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1235621434 25588 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2009 04:10:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:10:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 26 05:11:50 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LcXb9-0001Vr-2w
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:11:47 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44271 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LcXZo-0002d9-EL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:10:24 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LcXZj-0002d1-TU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:10:19 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LcXZi-0002cj-Gg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:10:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44252 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LcXZi-0002cg-BX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:10:18 -0500
Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:35623)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <miles@gnu.org>)
	id 1LcXZg-00043M-AT; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:10:17 -0500
Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46])
	by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n1Q4ACY8007753; 
	Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:10:13 +0900 (JST)
Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.20] [10.29.19.20]) by
	relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:10:13 +0900
Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.112.240] [10.114.112.240]) by
	relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:10:13 +0900
Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295)
	id EE54C52E256; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:10:12 +0900 (JST)
System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Blat: Foop
In-Reply-To: <ilbpspq2fn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of
	"Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:53:16 -0500")
Original-Lines: 11
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109336
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/109336>

Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> is a safer bet at this stage than the 5000 line one involved in using
> autoconf 2.63.

I've no idea whether 2.61 is particularly any safer than 2.63 -- the
version used in the dev tree seems kinda random...

-Miles

-- 
Brain, n. An apparatus with which we think we think.