From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\_ patch Date: 06 Feb 2003 18:17:34 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200302060044.SAA21429@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200302060106.TAA21443@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <5xel6lu3lh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044523267 14950 80.91.224.249 (6 Feb 2003 09:21:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@m17n.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18giBn-0003oD-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 10:19:23 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18giKm-0004le-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 10:28:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18giCn-0003kz-02 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 04:20:25 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18giCM-0003df-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 04:19:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18giCK-0003bH-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 04:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.202]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18giBu-000362-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 04:19:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.194])h169ICU06521; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:18:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv.nec.co.jp (mailgate52.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.198]) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id h169ICi03908; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:18:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.30.114.133]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id h169HZq20662; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:18:10 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) id h169HYB15294; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:17:34 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 7FAB136F6; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 18:17:34 +0900 (JST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <5xel6lu3lh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Original-Lines: 13 Original-cc: Luc Teirlinck Original-cc: ted@oconnor.cx Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11412 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11412 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > What about ?\SPC Only if ?\RET, ?\TAB, etc. work too (otherwise it's just too inconsistent -- if ?\SPC worked then people would quite naturally expect things like ?\RET or ?\TAB to work as well). [I guess there's not a conflict between ?\r and ?\RET because one uses lowercase and the other uppercase, though it makes me a bit nervous...] -Miles -- I'd rather be consing.