From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source" Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 Message-ID: References: <010001cc29eb$fc806cb0$f5814610$@cs.ua.edu> <87vcw9ksdd.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87hb7rlmjt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308198205 2142 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2011 04:23:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 04:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 16 06:23:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QX46y-0005jg-Hc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 06:23:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42010 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX46s-00010F-Mw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX46f-000104-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX46d-0004H8-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:23:01 -0400 Original-Received: from relmlor4.renesas.com ([210.160.252.174]:63263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QX46d-0004H4-Jf; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 00:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from relmlir4.idc.renesas.com ([10.200.68.154]) by relmlor4.idc.renesas.com ( SJSMS) with ESMTP id <0LMV00C1E869NW30@relmlor4.idc.renesas.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relmlac2.idc.renesas.com ([10.200.69.22]) by relmlir4.idc.renesas.com ( SJSMS) with ESMTP id <0LMV0034W8699C50@relmlir4.idc.renesas.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by relmlac2.idc.renesas.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id AFBBC28070; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relmlac2.idc.renesas.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relmlac2.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE23E28088; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relmlii2.idc.renesas.com [10.200.68.66] by relmlac2.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP id PAS01458; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,373,1304262000"; d="scan'208";a="32358126" Original-Received: from unknown (HELO relay21.aps.necel.com) ([10.29.19.50]) by relmlii2.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50] [10.29.19.50]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.96.212] [10.114.96.212]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 2FB7B52E1F6; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:22:57 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-reply-to: Original-Lines: 15 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (1203?) X-Received-From: 210.160.252.174 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140534 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > "Open source" was going to be mentioned, so we want "free software" to > be mentioned too. Incidentally, what's your opinion of the somewhat common term "FOSS" -- "Free and Open-Source Software"? Thanks, -Miles -- "Nah, there's no bigger atheist than me. Well, I take that back. I'm a cancer screening away from going agnostic and a biopsy away from full-fledged Christian." [Adam Carolla]