From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: longlines-mode Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:58:09 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87k5kvtthe.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8763wfnzpt.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204167537 14101 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2008 02:58:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Johan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bockg=E5rd?= To: David Reitter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 28 03:59:23 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUYzQ-0006Pj-DB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 03:59:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUYyu-0006Kg-CH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:58:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUYyd-0006DK-Pn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUYyb-0006BT-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:58:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUYyb-0006BF-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:58:29 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUYyX-0008CW-JK; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:58:26 -0500 Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.46]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m1S2w9bH019008; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:58:10 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.20] [10.29.19.20]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:58:10 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.112.215] [10.114.112.215]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:58:10 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 6D369564; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:58:10 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (David Reitter's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:05:24 +0000") Original-Lines: 20 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90690 Archived-At: David Reitter writes: >> Line wrapping during redisplay >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-07/msg01112.html > > This would be much appreciated. It would fix a number of problems with > third-party packages. In my case, writing a 200-page thesis in LaTeX > with AUCTeX, longlines mode and proportional fonts has brought up > numerous issues that had been pointed out in the thread you refer to. I think Kim's patch is a good thing, but please note that it will _not_ magically solve all your problems. In particular, there are many issues associated with _editing_ display-wrapped code -- common Emacs' commands will often do the wrong thing (most obviously C-a, C-n, and other line-movement commands). -Miles -- Ich bin ein Virus. Mach' mit und kopiere mich in Deine .signature.