From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:06:44 +0900 Message-ID: References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> <873a0p1dqt.fsf@telefonica.net> <87r5o9yr4y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87mxywzx2r.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocjcejeo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83r5o8l3oo.fsf@gnu.org> <873a0nyqjx.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87sk8nx7ba.fsf@telefonica.net> <83y6iedi2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87ljecrcdb.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267427224 3843 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2010 07:07:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 07:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 01 08:06:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlziV-0000Do-5f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 08:06:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlziU-0000Lj-BF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:06:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NlziO-0000KH-4n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:06:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46611 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NlziM-0000K9-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:06:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlziL-00071B-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:06:50 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:42235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NlziJ-00070p-Mb; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 02:06:48 -0500 Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.54]) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o2176ji8001658; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:06:45 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:06:45 +0900 Original-Received: from dhlpc061 ([10.114.113.157] [10.114.113.157]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:06:44 +0900 Original-Received: by dhlpc061 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 94A7652E1F0; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:06:44 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:56:53 -0500") Original-Lines: 19 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121489 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Probably doesn't make any difference: he would have typed "bzr add ." > rather than "bzr add" and the result would have been the same. No, I think that's wrong. I don't really know why he typed "bzr add" (i.e., whether by sheer accident, or in confusion about what it did), but in general it seems _much_ more likely for somebody to accidentally type a command with no arguments, than with an explicit "this directory". Thus given the somewhat rare nature of needing to do such a thing, this default for "bzr seems" an exceedingly poor choice. Hopefully the bzr devs will change this. -Miles -- Selfish, adj. Devoid of consideration for the selfishness of others.