From: Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Subject: Re: Gud lord!
Date: 09 Jun 2003 17:11:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <buofzmj656u.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030609091728.2C7D.JMBARRANQUERO@laley.wke.es>
Juanma Barranquero <jmbarranquero@laley.wke.es> writes:
> Every single time that big changes (big == "affecting more than one file")
> are suggested in the list, there's little or no discussion, no
> one really opposes... and then, after the fact, disagreement suddenly
> pop ups. I find it quite a bit tiring.
Get used to it.
Obviously it's rather _better_ to speak your mind before a change, if
possible, but:
I often don't follow threads which don't seem interesting in their first
few messages, and there have been big changes discussed at the tail-end
of threads which may not even resemble the original topic! Even if you
go to the trouble of posting an obvious announcement message (like Kim's
recent warnings), I think it's not uncommon for people to miss such
things for whatever reason.
The effects of big changes are often rather hard to miss once they're
done, however. If there's a problem, there's a problem, and I'd hope
that people will speak up when they see one, regardless of how annoying
it is for the person who made the change.
-Miles
--
.Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-09 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-07 15:37 Gud lord! Nick Roberts
2003-06-07 16:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-07 16:43 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-07 16:47 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-07 21:05 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-07 22:07 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-07 22:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-08 0:01 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-08 0:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-11 13:36 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-06-11 14:04 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-12 21:15 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-06-12 22:37 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-11 14:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-12 1:43 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-12 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-12 15:54 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-07 23:47 ` Miles Bader
[not found] ` <1055032089.30724.114.camel@lan1>
2003-06-08 2:02 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-08 4:40 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-12 17:49 ` Per Abrahamsen
2003-06-08 2:19 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-07 22:59 ` yet another todo editing system Joe Corneli
2003-06-08 7:51 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-06-08 8:52 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-08 10:37 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-06-08 12:32 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-08 20:05 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-09 7:29 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-09 7:34 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-09 8:01 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-09 8:16 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-09 9:27 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-09 10:54 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-09 11:41 ` Alex Schroeder
2003-06-09 19:43 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-06-08 12:48 ` Alex Schroeder
2003-06-09 0:21 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 10:05 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-09 10:29 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-15 15:59 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-16 1:44 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-16 17:57 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 0:21 ` Gud lord! Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 1:23 ` Jonathan Walther
2003-06-09 23:00 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-10 1:28 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-10 1:53 ` Jonathan Walther
2003-06-11 0:24 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 14:32 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-10 12:21 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-10 12:54 ` David Kastrup
2003-06-10 17:10 ` Jonathan Walther
2003-06-11 8:27 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 7:51 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 8:11 ` Miles Bader [this message]
2003-06-09 8:32 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 8:42 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-09 8:56 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 13:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-09 14:07 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-11 13:00 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-06-11 13:53 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 0:21 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 7:49 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 19:29 ` Not arch (was Re: Gud lord!) Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=buofzmj656u.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp \
--to=miles@lsi.nec.co.jp \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.