From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:59:53 +0900 Message-ID: References: <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702CD2B19@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702D254AF@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <86y79yrrdz.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702DB6689@maileube01.misys.global.ad> <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702DB6BDD@maileube01.misys.global.ad> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202378427 3024 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2008 10:00:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA To: "Marshall\, Simon" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 11:00:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JN3Yd-0000TX-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:00:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JN3YA-0003ni-Na for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:00:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JN3Y5-0003nH-JX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JN3Y0-0003ml-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JN3Y0-0003mi-L6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JN3Y0-0006me-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JN3Xz-000505-Ue for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:59:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JN3Xx-0006ls-0h for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 05:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JN3Xw-0006lQ-8R; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:59:56 -0500 Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.54]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m179xm0r023154; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:59:54 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay11.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.16] [10.29.19.16]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:59:54 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.112.215] [10.114.112.215]) by relay11.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:59:54 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 0062243C; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:59:53 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <6EE216E1AA959543A555C60FF34FB76702DB6BDD@maileube01.misys.global.ad> (Simon Marshall's message of "Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:55:07 -0000") Original-Lines: 13 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88416 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20921 Archived-At: "Marshall, Simon" writes: > Ok. Though it is worth pointing out that the other few who have > expressed a preference have said that the default would be better as t. > It is also worth pointing out that the other (non-Emacs) build tool I > use also behaves that way. Personally I'd prefer it scroll, and then stop at the first sign of an error. That seems like the best of both worlds... -Miles -- Hers, pron. His.