From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unicode branch version updates Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:46:32 +0900 Message-ID: References: <61brapi34t.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <200502140226.LAA29700@etlken.m17n.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108350670 26109 80.91.229.2 (14 Feb 2005 03:11:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 03:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-unicode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 14 04:11:06 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0Wcz-0004Rz-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 04:10:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0WsS-0000qG-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:26:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0WqB-0008Sd-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:24:05 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0Wq1-0008Pf-KX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:23:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0Wpy-0008LE-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:23:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [210.143.35.52] (helo=tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0WFy-0001c2-KE; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 21:46:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailgate3.nec.co.jp (mailgate53.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.161] (may be forged)) by tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id j1E2kZg27156; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:46:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from root@localhost) by mailgate3.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) id j1E2kZH25313; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:46:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edsgm01.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.50.208.11]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.11.7/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id j1E2kYS06750; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:46:34 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by edsgm01.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1E2kX53009794; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:46:33 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mctpc71 (mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp [10.30.118.121]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.12.10/8.12.8/EDcg v2.01-mc/1046780839) with ESMTP id j1E2kXKt017439; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:46:33 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mctpc71 (Postfix, from userid 31295) id D33783F0; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:46:32 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Kenichi Handa System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <200502140226.LAA29700@etlken.m17n.org> (Kenichi Handa's message of "Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:26:33 +0900 (JST)") Original-Lines: 32 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33364 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33364 Kenichi Handa writes: >> I'd like to commit the following patch to the Emacs unicode branch. >> It changes unicode-branch version references from "22" to "23", and >> renames the unicode-branch-specific ChangeLog files to >> "ChangeLog.unicode" (from "ChangeLog.22"). > > Thank you for taking care of this matter. But, I vaguely remember > that the reason I changed ChangeLog.unicode (I was using it when I was > working on it locally) to ChangeLog.22 was that if the extention of > ChangeLog file is not digits, something wrong happened. I'm not sure > now. > > Could you please commit the changes after you confirm that your or > Dave's method for automatically selecting a correct ChangeLog file > name still works? I use such "non-numeric ChangeLog extensions" -- e.g., in my example code you quoted, "ChangeLog.tiling" -- regularly for my other branches with no obvious problems. If there is a subtle bug I haven't noticed with such ChangeLogs, we should fix that bug. The fact that you originally used the ".unicode" extension originally confirms that it's at least the "natural" name. :-) Anyway, I'll do one more brief test with "unicode" in particular and then commit it. Thanks, -Miles -- Occam's razor split hairs so well, I bought the whole argument!