From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TeX input method Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:30:44 +0900 Message-ID: References: <858xjxzgfs.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <851wppzemy.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160026455 11356 80.91.229.2 (5 Oct 2006 05:34:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 05:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 07:34:13 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVLrw-0001L6-DT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 07:34:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVLrv-0003A6-MB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GVLrk-00037N-HU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:33:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GVLri-00037B-Qz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:33:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVLri-000378-Ne for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [203.180.232.82] (helo=mgate02.necel.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GVLyH-0002ws-Ts; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:40:38 -0400 Original-Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com (relay21 [10.29.19.50]) by mgate02.necel.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k953JHBF020464; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:33:45 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.24] [10.29.19.24]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:33:45 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.97.235] [10.114.97.235]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:33:45 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id EED42508; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:30:44 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Kenichi Handa System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Wed\, 04 Oct 2006 11\:55\:51 +0900") Original-Lines: 17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60420 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa writes: > So, the only question is whether Stefan's change is worth > breaking backward compatiblity or not. Why not have "tex-discreet" and "tex-pedantic" input methods, the latter being the current input method, and the former being Stefan's slightly modified version. The name "tex" could be an alias for one of those (which one I don't know, but I tend towards the former). [I agree with Stefan that the tex input method is a convenient thing to turn on for getting random weird characters, and that I'd prefer that it be unintrusive more than it be strictly the same as tex in all those weird corner cases.] -Miles -- I'd rather be consing.