From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: S-backspace Date: 05 Jun 2003 11:40:42 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20030527141845.GA13165@gnu.org> <200305271626.h4RGQ9F16445@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200305300110.h4U1AGR19544@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200306050149.h551nms26760@eel.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054780893 5783 80.91.224.249 (5 Jun 2003 02:41:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 02:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alkibiades@gmx.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 05 04:41:31 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Nkgd-0001Uf-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 04:41:07 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19NkyU-0002kk-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 04:59:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Nkit-0000ff-7l for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 22:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19NkiR-0000YQ-QL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 22:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19NkiQ-0000YA-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 22:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.214]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Nkgl-0008Ci-Ci; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 22:41:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193])h552enw07857; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:40:49 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id h552eni28987; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:40:49 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from edtmg03.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.26.16.203]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id h552emJ24169; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:40:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) id LAA23779; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:40:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) with ESMTP id h552egNH007724; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:40:47 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 3A3ED3732; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:40:42 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: <200306050149.h551nms26760@eel.dms.auburn.edu> Original-Lines: 16 Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14740 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14740 Luc Teirlinck writes: > C-S- is probably safer than S-M-. > > C-S-k is more intuitive. However, are there people who actually use > the Caps Lock key? Because C-S-k might give them trouble. > > Are there any objections against changing the binding of > kill-whole-line from M-S- to C-S-? > (To avoid people accidentally killing their X server by hitting the > wrong key.) I could commit that change if there are no objections. I think C-S-k is better (easier to type, and more intuitive). -Miles -- Run away! Run away!