From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestions for mode-line-format changes Date: 22 Aug 2002 11:38:59 +0900 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <5xk7mlfsvf.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200208210429.NAA19918@etlken.m17n.org> <5xfzx87e0d.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1029984247 14919 127.0.0.1 (22 Aug 2002 02:44:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 02:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17hhx8-0003sW-00 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 04:44:06 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17hiPo-0005OS-00 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 05:13:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17hhyJ-0002oa-00; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17hhsK-0001ry-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17hhsH-0001qU-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:39:07 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([210.143.35.52]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17hhsH-0001o6-00; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 22:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.195]) by TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g7M2d2425734; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:39:02 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv4.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.196]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g7M2d0g19962; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:39:01 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.30.114.133]) by mailsv4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILSV4-NEC) with ESMTP id g7M2d0c19902; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:39:00 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.10.2+Sun/3.7Wlsi_mx_6.0) with ESMTP id g7M2cxs13771; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:38:59 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 99A3E36F2; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:38:59 +0900 (JST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 18 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:6752 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:6752 huug writes: > > Don't want. I want it in the main window (little independent X > > windows are generally pretty icky; see ediff for a particularly > > stupid and annoying example). > > If you mean ediff should use a more tool-tip like frame, I agree. No, I mean ediff shouldn't use the stupid little `command frame'. It shouldn't use any new frames at all, it should just make the ediff commands available in the two buffers being diffed. [ediff's user interface seems generally pretty bad; I like the functionality, but never use it because it drives me nuts every time I try] -Miles -- 80% of success is just showing up. --Woody Allen