From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:25:41 +0900 Message-ID: References: <73c8965e-2672-4997-aa32-340b5611d7ae@well-done.deisui.org> <87ps303tzf.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1184120760 2384 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2007 02:26:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 02:26:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 11 04:25:58 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I8Rtu-0000q2-Hy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:25:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8Rtu-0001i2-0o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:25:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I8Rtr-0001hu-I3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I8Rtq-0001gC-4O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I8Rtq-0001fx-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I8Rto-0004yr-Gl; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:25:53 -0400 Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.54]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l6B2PfFU018382; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:25:41 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from relay31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.16] [10.29.19.16]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:25:41 +0900 Original-Received: from dhapc248.dev.necel.com ([10.114.98.116] [10.114.98.116]) by relay31.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:25:41 +0900 Original-Received: by dhapc248.dev.necel.com (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 2BBCA3A6; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:25:40 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue\, 10 Jul 2007 17\:29\:02 -0400") Original-Lines: 18 X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74620 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64920 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> That can happen later. For now let's just do the simple and >> straight-forward thing. > > Indeed, we're talking about switching the Emacs trunk's version og Gnus to > the Gnus trunk, not about changing the Gnus trunk. Yes, but I really want the code in both to be as similar as possible. I could just toss out the new pgg*.el stuff when merging, but then Gnus may stop working with pgg in Emacs. Given that pgg in the Gnus trunk is pretty much a lame duck anyway, it seems a lot saner to just get things into a good and mergeable state in the Gnus trunk and then merge it into Emacs with minimal changes. -Miles -- Is it true that nothing can be known? If so how do we know this? -Woody Allen