From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Olt/New Emacs 21 style -- any replies? Date: 10 Jul 2002 11:13:09 +0900 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <3D2B383C.350123E1@veritas.com> <5lelecxvkn.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1026267227 20849 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2002 02:13:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17S6zC-0005QA-00 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:13:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17S6zX-0001vj-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp ([210.143.35.52]) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17S6yg-0001uh-00; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 22:13:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.197]) by TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W01080315) with ESMTP id g6A2DCe00110; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:13:12 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mailsv.nec.co.jp (mailgate51.nec.co.jp [10.7.69.190]) by mailgate4.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILGATE-NEC) with ESMTP id g6A2DBo21073; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:13:11 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp ([10.30.114.133]) by mailsv.nec.co.jp (8.11.6/3.7W-MAILSV-NEC) with ESMTP id g6A2DA424189; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:13:11 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (mcspd15 [10.30.114.174]) by mcsss2.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (8.10.2+Sun/3.7Wlsi_mx_6.0) with ESMTP id g6A2DAK22025; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:13:10 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp (Postfix, from userid 31295) id 137CD37D5; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:13:09 +0900 (JST) Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 15 Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:612 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:612 Glenn Morris writes: > > Why not in "The Standard Text Editor" ? > > Hmm, tough call. I *think* vi edges out "The Standard Text Editor" in the > torture stakes, but I haven't got a guinea pig to test it on. If you give an invalid command, vi responds with annoying and arrogant beeps, a raucous scream of oppression, whereas ed soothes you with a humble question-mark. Give me ed any day. -Miles -- Run away! Run away!