From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:45:24 +0300 Message-ID: References: <83o8sf3r7i.fsf@gnu.org> <2E218879-0F24-4A20-B210-263C8D0BEEA4@gmail.com> <838sjh2red.fsf@gnu.org> <83369o3bvb.fsf@gnu.org> <816186eb-baac-f5c7-04df-a3f30780d91d@yandex.ru> <83k1301qq4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="92330"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 Cc: casouri@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, akrl@sdf.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 31 17:46:32 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jJJ5z-000Nq2-2E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:46:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJJ5y-0000yx-5B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJJ50-00080D-R4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:45:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJJ4z-0005X6-NT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:45:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]:34149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJJ4z-0005Vw-Gh; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 11:45:29 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id 65so26630671wrl.1; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:45:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w64SgM5nO1zu1wMxgef0qC31oJVS3RdRzsIgcT0JfJ4=; b=Z0iCYZFR8TqMvmBAS3PCcV+FTRKWcB0JJTUtIZBLRzkYWhC+VScyUv7KTxTSXHhLHP A8EhNFC3brDHYJKGt8eSMInK4JcGxygcdSYeheY9MCPcA50Q8nnkoqeqAulc+PrmH3x0 SciEuhbz3VOTYuuambtaY6X1j1FaHG4D+tPShRvNtxVP/ifIAXCFo5T68DzN0YmThS2h HIsh+qljQ0BG05z7sj1cwPEhQfZgiepVPurdzwcjW+XfYTmkt0mjbd6ycjwwV5yvqA/q AQEXdjRH03ECiOMwZAkty3Ugs4va+vCFcVNpe2uJ+EgIM3h2iutVcVbnufsY9cyNbsGF E11A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w64SgM5nO1zu1wMxgef0qC31oJVS3RdRzsIgcT0JfJ4=; b=a7bvkjY4LtrXP2ftkLVI8RThePQeLIYgR3qko5kI/KTA4ZtW5lRw4z/o1mFbeMtCI0 EhuDoMgulv8R71PGqOUX9kx7e6Q7isl7zMgxQ/7F5sgg9r7akEg6AnhLa5orG/CGi8hA nKz/ByMWs+hzWKZ4DtxSFUKSVKdL0A5z8yQoo8le+24RSPClSzWhEXfBbo54xtPYiWDK MYt1onezoEsnwMhekuHEDJ/Y4N1KdxAutcIRVzpLfTDxxq/qQYvZ9TOO30w2FTcGLYRl rcKo/fPGQSSGlemDGHaIOz/GZGDz9Dx2kBKRzejpP8S45z5yuTcabD5nq3XvT2vdwG46 MXsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ31+LwT4uQJ9LJJhuBoIvnpCGyI324BzpyNqILgkaIlel85t//P cp6SMckGJBchE27aSFwrRzOszC8P X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtWWG6O/3IHwBlZ3N76Mw4/dcfwTkoiNUfghr6gH1/B4F2o8Pnk9DzfGhz+8zrGtStQW/xJvQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:c984:: with SMTP id f4mr1089249wrh.81.1585669527729; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:45:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm29578527wri.45.2020.03.31.08.45.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 08:45:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k1301qq4.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::42c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246115 Archived-At: On 31.03.2020 18:36, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > But it definitely can work with parts of the buffer, and we don't need > it to have a complete AST for this particular job. Syntax highlighting can and often does depend on buffer contents after the region. It's one thing to mis-highlight a part of the buffer because the contents are incomplete (the user hasn't typed the full expression). It's another thing to mis-highlight it because the chunk requested by jit-lock ended on a particular ambiguous position.