From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64985: 29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via package-vc doesn't correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 11:10:54 -0700 Message-ID: References: <8e555eb8-529d-d11c-66c7-bd16f5d45be7@gmail.com> <931A378C-454C-442C-9551-9A0905F1CBFC@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11971"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 64985@debbugs.gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 01 20:12:16 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qQtqx-0002oA-Ey for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 20:12:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qQtqn-0004C6-Au; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qQtql-0004Bx-41 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qQtqk-0003Mv-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qQtqk-0006B5-5h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64985 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 64985-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64985.169091346223666 (code B ref 64985); Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64985) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2023 18:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qQtpl-00069X-PB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]:56777) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qQtpk-00069G-LB for 64985@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:11:00 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1bbff6b2679so19885895ad.1 for <64985@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 11:11:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1690913455; x=1691518255; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pWc7dhEHjiORILPoGbpFYpcWMiIVpvdbK6UrFoJ30Bw=; b=BtS84io4QwE581ozt5jxWKvj9CUPMd8u+X0THypoIGyAaTrAXP7gSJlxx4Hy6lZz7x 7Ag6f8zQLEo8SZXOHeDBi2eBmrD8LgC3XYYRr7f5YCpaF0mDQNzAS7tehKaIxqdVfpYk HzYNwy1LYB4dPCNS26ajFz34lqAQOE1g41fuHzwzXbtavsBJkFxRpbSllPV55qL/il/u pLiHV5SiOK07xa7O/ssnUeD+Q5Bh/M+9hm2zVDA2Gbs5OqZSh0o+wYLcZeOnu4Wbg8pz 9nyZwTlMA27wAxpZCZ/IYlVEBs1BXy6XatXLE9PjfXm5Rnf5wqy7gEd60rrKQbYmX7Jq XlEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690913455; x=1691518255; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pWc7dhEHjiORILPoGbpFYpcWMiIVpvdbK6UrFoJ30Bw=; b=LYw6hQv38DPj4AVgKWcbxqBa2excGg+LeKgMq1eQ4wMBoOqI6QdiYwUzlpvfc/u4kd vN0oihAYFK/6C/fxuIJgGU/K34YjjMWEC2l9VOJMrKQ+pvYTtYbfXaQuhJeIWaauZoq/ sXroS/tMM7NZ4nUX8Icr/sTuvKq/K5BPYd2dHtJL0CSTxjV8cfw/xfTEiT687RENFEcd n3ps9igsDB1+KwZ56eBPkJkGa3IQO73Eej6Y+Jm+TYdzSjx4OqHeg4h0rtxmykvz+Zkd BVNzmmn7ZOVh/I6hTrcXgeRkJcLLxuj7y3uGoG7P6BV+thapl2uP6oDXy9buI91hZGtK iWHw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLacoCxlRh9gzHh60JLEVPoUSE+ejfkW0zbDHWhLq2UxvybCQAhf 3fCua8IBeC0oc4gN2tP0QgQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlE0UrWjIzz8Bdx7xhbOrUTB5zpMasb0E5OMyTMVQBNmHQgepO9m3RrsLmXCQqv/19DMVSAd5A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e5c1:b0:1bb:8f37:dd0f with SMTP id u1-20020a170902e5c100b001bb8f37dd0fmr13081412plf.45.1690913454571; Tue, 01 Aug 2023 11:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id iy15-20020a170903130f00b001b801044466sm10820861plb.114.2023.08.01.11.10.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 01 Aug 2023 11:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <931A378C-454C-442C-9551-9A0905F1CBFC@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:266472 Archived-At: On 8/1/2023 10:29 AM, Mattias Engdegård wrote: > An alternative would be to match against > > (mapconcat #'identity byte-compile-ignore-files "\\|") ...) Yeah, I thought about that too. I'm not sure if this would be better than using 'seq-some' though; if anyone else has strong opinions on this, I'm happy to change the code to whatever the preferred implementation is. (I'm also not sure the specific implementation matters too much since I doubt this bit is a performance bottleneck.)