Re: vc-state and unregistered

[Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>]

On 04/24/2016 10:41 PM, Michael Albinus wrote:

>> And if buffer-file-name is outside of any version control, does your
>> version of vc-state return nil?
>
> No. I didn't test this. As said, the tests must be improved, that's what
> they are good for. And bugs must be fixed.

We could add a separate test for that, but the simplest fix would 
require updating the existing tests as well, and then that test wouldn't 
be necessary. See the commit I pushed.

Anyway, feel free to add it. We didn't finish the discussion about 
semantics, so it didn't seem proper to me to add tests for them.

> But for the other cases, files under version control, my last commits
> have shown improvements I believe. That's why I find your reaction to
> revert everything ... annoying.

Not everything, just the parts that conflicted with the patch I've sent 
previously. Which I had to recreate.

So in the interest of speed, I've also removed all

   (should (eq (vc-state tmp-name) (vc-state tmp-name backend)))

checks. They aren't essential, and finding which of them are failing 
exactly is too time-consuming.

Let's only add each of them back after they pass. I'd also like to have 
the different steps of each scenario as separate tests, so that ERT can 
tell us which failed.