From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:39:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <83zi7wr6jc.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1z0csxa.fsf_-_@web.de> <83k1yzqshk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510249157 15219 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2017 17:39:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 17:39:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 09 18:39:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCqnF-0003Xf-Cc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:39:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38117 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCqnK-0007DW-Tq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:39:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51739) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCqnE-0007DK-Ck for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCqnD-0005Kq-Ja for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:39:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]:50471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCqnD-0005Kb-EB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 12:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id p7so8682539qkd.7 for ; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:39:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZFwkD0AUcuoZ1nxPgwYfvDIfd5UmPPP7ijK+ePXHj3E=; b=N9HV4ONaStjk2pL0uAguSope/d8UhRf37xXOSYQamX08bt3q7JwmYX0FObvi+eMQ5O QP1fNfsdx3MWDsddpTY+lrJ9vSFnBYK+KyR+4WkVuPhVkiocfWOtlTvB5e29TAqg2jXO /jTfiOZZueOAhzD3cEJKt+uXvsBU9NGkH+t68LUEvqv4AShWIGwrWmFx91ITd33NRE9x L0qgXrinRwv6m2j6vTzfDs5E4rmt26fKMwkrvhDb7FYYyNQ7oQWWJNSuyDz04SzwKCuf oXsHFbfDjXywRiccbOGVyoCwm/GUfPwwMaCRQwDOsynFn3iOFMScLPH2GkGu3kaT/O1R t5mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZFwkD0AUcuoZ1nxPgwYfvDIfd5UmPPP7ijK+ePXHj3E=; b=jIRSQT2CBFiTKK/zOyUlLGrbkAUrVQEUTHakwpZOx4Vka6hAhhXVNqDb+o/5g40L4X Uy42DYqj39DL6s0bbE7bXyGsTMHP18SXrkbjBOJ2+8xi5GmwweYblVj0bLMU+BfrZoEQ g2K1Is0OhHlwecX6N5SKWlzuFcpYxVbkGJDwVeQTIrMl2FxhRPrGUZp6byjqTXq1veN6 ecxXCogzbbrBhW1TN2POIVOaLss7+5HYuX5EJwgJUuGHwanE+NN1wm8ac5ljYrlNBnsy kIU+fNmkPihZPmArpR//WVGC260JQ5r4RrTEmQRcO33vndrT36SfMCC7iCXUFHKBLmRS x1PA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5Hja6034Tfs1NRW1WjUzXHoBqpg/c48l3pSQemfzbee1uCnjq4 +tHvbo12vRc3OwMbzgLwQxIOJl82 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZOZ38q4rf/hjVjrbRbxk8WgRQ7ZHShqnzzyYiZF1xVVoLgsOwowLxyMz5fnAxA02yyReEGcw== X-Received: by 10.55.120.131 with SMTP id t125mr2036961qkc.63.1510249146461; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:39:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:184:4180:66e7:a903:dbdb:a321:b9eb? ([2601:184:4180:66e7:a903:dbdb:a321:b9eb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm5022048qtc.53.2017.11.09.09.39.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Nov 2017 09:39:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83k1yzqshk.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-GB X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220001 Archived-At: On 2017-11-09 12:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Michael Heerdegen >> Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 23:22:09 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >>> Given that "lazy evaluation" seems not to be described anywhere in the >>> ELisp manual, I think we cannot get away with "---" here, and will >>> have to add at least something to the manual. >> >> Well, it's in subr-x because I'm not sure that it is yet a good idea to >> "advertize it so loudly" as Stefan uses to say. Nothing in subr-x is >> described in the manual. > > I'm not sure this should be in subr-x.el. That file is AFAIU for > stuff used _internally_ in Emacs, which this macro isn't. Why doesn't that macro go to ELPA first, possibly to be integrated in Emacs proper if it's found to be useful?