From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26 build breaking on RHEL 6.6 GTK2 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:26:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <874lnbjfp0.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516818316 17170 195.159.176.226 (24 Jan 2018 18:25:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:25:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 24 19:25:11 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eePjE-0003El-Ty for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:24:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36887 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eePlF-0007N9-3l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:27:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eePl8-0007Mr-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:26:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eePl7-0007ll-8Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:26:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eePl7-0007lU-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:26:53 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eePl6-00046K-BO; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:26:52 -0500 X-Spook: red noise Guzman Warning MILSATCOM Gas rs9512c ASDIC X-Ran: xHzc|;YSdgoEaCdj69gcB*hU"Ej4IDCQSao+8cl%)e;d*XwJTeVi4xIpw\l5D";8}v"+=@ X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <874lnbjfp0.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Wed, 24 Jan 2018 19:04:59 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222190 Archived-At: Robert Pluim wrote: > [1] Did we ever get anywhere on a CI setup for emacs? "We" already have one. I find it irritating that it is ignored, given the effort that has gone into it. But yes, there is apparently a plan to make a new setup that will be different, and perhaps it will (somehow) test all possible build combinations. I still think the onus is on people changing the display code to at least check that it compiles with the common toolkit options, particularly on the release branch at a time like this.