From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: trnsz@pobox.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36233: 26.2; Tokenization error in rcirc parser Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:53:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <884c1235-744e-43b2-b379-77b3b3b04a9f@www.fastmail.com> <87a7ehxpen.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5d06f388_79e2a9e3_42a" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="253223"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36233@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 17 04:17:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hchCp-0013my-5T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 04:17:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hchCo-00032V-6b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 22:17:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hchBv-0002Sk-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 22:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hchBs-0002Md-I2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 22:16:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hchBh-0002JN-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 22:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hchBh-00088L-PE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 22:16:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: trnsz@pobox.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 02:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36233 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36233-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36233.156073773329424 (code B ref 36233); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 02:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36233) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2019 02:15:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41773 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hchBE-0007eC-7k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 22:15:32 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:61835) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hcgto-0006ey-2w for 36233@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B59114C644; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:57:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to :cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qddoLkBWb1wWW5BaR7t/f+ALO6s=; b=mTjF6X JIzzTnzQprwPshAEZmuCaR5VI1owf30wv/dk/lqPUYp1la7cc+FgRohfDYxcGacT MmOmhMjXmVMuFpi1AeijL/Qppv/06OV/EE2NWpcHpW0IKeGQDFvrAU/gB3Bww5kf +jIbhH6IomiMRqPBmlyCFZlkAsnHEKFN/HqoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to:cc :message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=sNwrYeKsIFSnAzEqjGNBPFJu+5U3V02u yzcYu26Q5A5OGXZkUwn9SnARIQdCDdtv0Yz6ub9Uf+38dhhoF6QBgJMB0dTJDrsx kTi1u5/YXuS+HQjswtAwDvEMMeVfgqm1LPDcwVrcOT8LnM9+oZu325mXRfAT0N4j d3qlHyUU6yA= Original-Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AE414C643; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:57:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.140] (unknown [108.226.107.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9495614C641; Sun, 16 Jun 2019 21:57:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87a7ehxpen.fsf@gmail.com> X-Readdle-Message-ID: ba984989-350d-4927-a914-ced8da924409@Spark X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4418845A-90A3-11E9-976D-72EEE64BB12D-32570403!pb-smtp2.pobox.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 22:15:30 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:160707 Archived-At: --5d06f388_79e2a9e3_42a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Jun 16, 2019, 4:10 PM -0400, Noam Postavsky=C2=A0, wrote: > Yeah, it was using =5B=5E:=5D* to match the middle args. Patch below. I= =C2=A0added a test for this case in the patch, although this could probab= ly=C2=A0use some more testing to make sure I haven't broken other cases. I can confirm this fix works, but I've not done extensive testing (I'm no= t normally an rcirc user). Thanks for addressing this so quickly and I look forward to seeing the fi= x in a future release. -- Jeffrey H. Johnson jhj=40trnsz.com --5d06f388_79e2a9e3_42a Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
On Jun 16, 2019, 4:10 PM -0400, Noam Postavsky&=23160;, wrote:
Yeah, it was using =5B=5E= :=5D* to match the middle args. Patch below. I&=23160;added a test for th= is case in the patch, although this could probably&=23160;use some more t= esting to make sure I haven't broken other cases.

I can confirm this fix works, but I've not done extensive testing (I'm no= t normally an rcirc user).

Thanks for addressing this so quickly and I look fo= rward to seeing the fix in a future release.

--
Jeffrey H. Johnson
jhj=40trnsz.com
--5d06f388_79e2a9e3_42a--