From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Aleix_Conchillo_Flaqu=C3=A9?=" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ctrl:nocaps enables mark set? Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:09:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <878wu9498o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220450954 21266 80.91.229.12 (3 Sep 2008 14:09:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 14:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 03 16:10:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kat3g-0005YM-ON for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 16:10:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52076 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kat2h-0000bv-Gi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kat2d-0000bN-4V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kat2c-0000aZ-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51274 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kat2c-0000aL-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f12.google.com ([209.85.217.12]:37860) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kat2c-00033h-K8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 10:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk5 with SMTP id 5so5559130gxk.18 for ; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:09:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=VsYddChpoJRFomjovWgrTGRQasZ/76tvJ08u69iT9gQ=; b=f8RPN3EKBJKF/g5SA86RC+XQj8XPrNqN6cIlycKg0gK1w/94uYPr9qrOh+dCYRZFgT xxusL2lFKQVq1qlqtRZgPiyttRiHAir4xbbbqTauzDu9oWot6NvqCjWMIjem+aG1Cogt 5goLKRhKKa441uJbnSP62SGwd3iR7HL7i2jgQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Y/RF8zSEjlvEQauNDMTpJNkNTael7vanTJvgQqJjPpvPHYzsSTG5iZvPSIWESQhZOT pmKHMkS9ZgSSp1hdvzKw/citOC3KPjjDa5JwLJM6fbg3jXR7TI6FLUw0MHTSCW2Y0bkf +uMDc3fQj0krAdRNBJA4+cSTYg6iZMJIqJ5h8= Original-Received: by 10.151.144.15 with SMTP id w15mr12435917ybn.208.1220450941148; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.151.6.14 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:09:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878wu9498o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 49709e3dc794af95 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103501 Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 16:03, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > > > > I have reviewed my email and capslock has keycode 66 and ctrl has > > keycode 37 both producing Control_L. > > True. > > The problem is that there is also a feature of the X server that it > maintains up/down state for certain keys because it is so common to > check for chords with those keys. Specifically, the modifier keys. > As Andreas points out, your keycode 66 is in the list of modifiers as > BOTH a shiftlock key and a control key. You need to fix the modifier > list, not the keysym definition, of the key corresponding to 66. > > In-hopes-of-avoiding-flame-from-Andreas-who-really-knows-his-stuff-ly y'rs > OK, got it now. Sorry, I get a bit lost when talking about modifiers, keycodes, keysyms... :-( Aleix