On 2017-01-12 08:55, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Is there code that depends on this (a mixing with c)? If not, could we
>> consider changing the semantics of "c" instead? This mixing isn't clear from
>> the documentation, AFAICT.
> 
> `c` is a fairly recent introduction (introduced for opascal.el, FWIW),
> so maybe it's not too late to change its semantics.

That would be nice :) In the meantime, I implemented Noam's suggestion in the attached patch.

Clément.