From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26959: Feature request: bold underlines Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 00:16:47 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1494994696 19296 195.159.176.226 (17 May 2017 04:18:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 04:18:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 To: 26959@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 17 06:18:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqPa-0004qH-Bd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 06:18:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45411 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqPf-0003Ma-Ef for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqPW-0003MS-Ox for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:18:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqPS-0002cu-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46743) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqPS-0002cq-LA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqPS-0003k8-FK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 04:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 26959 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.149499462414318 (code B ref -1); Wed, 17 May 2017 04:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2017 04:17:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqOV-0003iq-QA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42968) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqOT-0003iK-WC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqOO-0002TK-A7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:57280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqOO-0002T5-6y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33933) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqON-00034h-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:16:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqOJ-0002SQ-9Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:55865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAqOI-0002SA-Ub for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 May 2017 00:16:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.189.18.195] ([18.189.18.195]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue005 [212.227.15.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LkUcJ-1dgrxS0Bkx-00cOKR for ; Wed, 17 May 2017 06:16:49 +0200 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pD4IBVcptf1/H2EtOH+W/93fRlBeA9UZwaZDvZfJzHIpUWQYY/F ZdOTEnJkFscxQ6f80dLkXjERILVwePG65XJXp0J9sEFe8FzBn4lN9Z1hTZBINTg0BpyQAWZ rLgPm82jB/aFRLA4V2xVSfX5z0WKMJpih6bPlaPmgLLFokwCcaRVyQyW/Qlx1R0ndBWo0eM 82ITA4m8gVwwt5EnGrfpg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mMgTLbTGB9w=:n8KiqUs6e/fqP1vk1AfHid 5wMSPSOepcQ1dQeApYBPspkf099x6qNHYLNyQlO0ipPaaO6zKBv+a/ebvTBHFRhszTcUuqUJ9 fN5DF4KFEUhvx2eezhttF/a7K6N1nLRQAWbQQjbc3XpUnSayLiaz9dW9XukK4EwUEM1i1xAmN RynRcqUKcmVmgssUKktw2ASEOEoEGb3c4HgoefA4Os86EdcKmvNuliggao9s8uRZslTsGMqgB sS40lWsE/dRkiud04bJGAdRh67tUPXbKZqOPZMqWlEKxlGpvtfRLSuvGIu8drYh+H6j0RgUfq 2SFT20vbh+3AJmgOSE4woBIOEx0gIWOjuFJiWIyrX98IvC2u2SOH8WIzvrgfQpe6GL/j+mzCv lrO/3CGGan4S/rOnLy0tyhfuz0unS6Zk4gmmRtdf8JeqZ2WPJ7Yf9yD3f5I2wHvgHbBDl0iLW UZQCBnt0SjH2nxMYwaZM23eVFPk6NytDn9zMvyPuy5fDpdTWVmJ3KsiN4TyZn93Ou6fSBbpnC o/VfMtQ0gRP0wNXI9EmkFPfVWNeqaK+sivppnHpQ8I63kUyCqF3w68yHFx/6m5NapC7277V1o 31sjBN5w7xrwH3WXP+qLgJe4PXsCj2MIJKOf62zwvWiIb6XuNmwNh2cgbiFhYM1HpYTTxgOqJ y0tMCWiW5FSrPYxGlaFPU36sL7DFCpdYY2E/IsfLOLk6/IJ79CK8OvRvEZvB5uTmu7naWBPAR HESzkukwDn8VdX4v X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:132557 Archived-At: Hi bug-gnu-emacs, Could underline thickness be made configurable? It would be nice to be able to pick between regular and thick/bold underlines (the later would be obtained by doubling the usual underline thickness, I imagine). Thanks, Clément.