From: Wanrong Lin <wrglin@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>,
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
39484@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#39484: 26.3; try-completion bug
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:44:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7f02833-10fe-9b3f-3ab6-6f06aef489a2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tuuf9xgp.fsf@igel.home>
For this case, "abc" might be OK, unless you think there is another
better answer. But in the example I gave, don't you think "Xyz" is
obviously a better answer than "xyz"?
The argument here is for some examples, the function does not return the
best answer, and also, does not seem to be consistent to me (for those
two examples I gave). There might be a reason behind this "compromise",
or, it might be just an arbitrary decision as documented in the comments
you gave. If it is the latter, can we improve on it? I think those are
valid questions.
Wanrong
On 10/27/2020 5:21 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> So what should (try-completion "abc" '("Abcde" "aBcdf" "abCdg")) return?
>
> Andreas.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-28 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 15:44 bug#39484: 26.3; try-completion bug Wanrong Lin
2020-10-27 18:42 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-10-27 19:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-10-27 19:17 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-10-27 20:17 ` Wanrong Lin
2020-10-27 20:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-10-27 20:44 ` Wanrong Lin
2020-10-27 21:21 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-10-28 0:44 ` Wanrong Lin [this message]
2020-10-28 0:47 ` Wanrong Lin
2020-10-28 0:57 ` Wanrong Lin
2020-10-28 7:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-10-28 9:35 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-10-28 9:42 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-10-28 9:50 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-10-28 9:56 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-10-28 11:16 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-10-28 11:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-10-28 12:59 ` Wanrong Lin
2020-10-28 14:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-10-28 15:47 ` Wanrong Lin
2020-10-28 16:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-04-23 13:17 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7f02833-10fe-9b3f-3ab6-6f06aef489a2@gmail.com \
--to=wrglin@gmail.com \
--cc=39484@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.