From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16503: 24.3; make-frame's user-position doesn't work Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:13:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20140119223333.GA10985@toad.ccur.com> <87h86j8az1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="126931"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: Todd Allen , 16503@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Todd Allen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 15 10:16:30 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hyAvu-000WtC-Kl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:16:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39402 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyAvt-00058d-CA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:16:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyAuX-0002Ii-DR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyAuW-0001A3-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyAuW-00019u-DV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyAuU-0004nQ-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:15:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16503 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16503-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16503.156585687118364 (code B ref 16503); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 08:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16503) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2019 08:14:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyAtz-0004m8-Do for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:14:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:47601) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyAty-0004lu-0y for 16503@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 04:14:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1565856820; bh=2efPcSjAHYXsQQUh2yqNRF0S14TBkdwsYpJ0DXesUZk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=csKJxQewo3pzh5uKyloW3Uk/H7UGL2xGXbO9L1W+sg6k+SReIAYrr78wl8N7l2PS8 XJiQ4AVJS6DqSdCh728kZMZVr0HFcZy8C5au44D/9T6IknYDgBmxrLKB8gCZZ97MkB GEexxrO9VkkBm0t7A0xTcWw4rJexdBesWPTlY6Hg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.5.89]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LaKaw-1ii05a2HIU-00m497; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:13:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87h86j8az1.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> Content-Language: de-DE X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:sn/BetYWohCz30l8wf3KobmFdEWULncfEM3ysO8Ykp1lkDLqUMn fxFO7x7zxy/fUY8e8Miv7HjD/mp5/pawxsY8pFIreBOwmtIXCmUGHZoFlgDA478+X2o7z7D pG+8cRWQ9pCTAbYFzIeOAxUtkyap8mkmUnaKtfl/TUP51upqC7AB0mipXLpWNtaherOtmzU 283rjy20avALKS6wVdGng== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:RglQLR8btp4=:BlnGnxBLuh95PViTKMLadD zqZhQaIHbsgXBSR+cwrqmLPz3mWcbmBUcB2XRSzixZgJoeY4uiAlzQMDQS9FtMb5CqKwfb8ae SBG04t93ooupTNSqSiItI/eqyxXTu6CkaUs8pURGMcrnvRU4FT6/JXOijT+YX17X79mBbJ2Td yvj2ocWs+vO2GbKCQIBtdG0OXzjkHWe0poLxuZs3D8I3z0ekoMuihk8/nN/qsSZlC7SFabP1v GRccwA5lOyEzqRt8HMU1DgkGeikI+EqtAsFgVDTw7bTgw59wVpJbnD3U/w7Cc0BdC6JNOCKD+ p6ev9YlIehAkiASRPKZmiegqZbj/1FG1cDL814Hcc0q3iuaLfeHMnQs+O3un4gwkIHrxd5eR7 gtpUBYBbLR8LEbDQRlSz9F0Xn+sPP35U9Gh6MoMVTY3XF2Z3b3ez10CpW7nIiTuRDmz40ySk7 +tbxzcPjvJmuSij9wZRbYP2QJBaEXyHk1M99q6oKn39MWLEd06RPEhq1oIpIuisFlk740gW11 2EcWcQKHY6yBvTzRDoalDNlhqjcPLA2SWsbO5LNlAD2A/DMv+CY/u4meKtt8gx0TQ0Zn51wwb jbeuExw2NiPYVvjemmxi/2EetML079BhZ9MDGyHdW77TUN5MMynJBv+gywxnjyyUSe4fXaz/A zFqcqx9atbuoFAXwHc/AogM8JMWrXr9+Olyz3pR92vEkdMPkRLz2LZeGY8jm5H8FLmVyAD2WF wBTQnynF4adB4dEaIbD6i23jdrQuPiUDI86POhzgIHXHBRLfDVhr4UIlpEun5+PwoAXg1Zq3 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165071 Archived-At: >> Issuing the following expression: >> (make-frame '((user-position . t) (left . 100) (top . 100))) >> creates a new frame with only a program-specified position in the >> WM_NORMAL_HINT, instead of a user-specified position. >> >> I started noticing this in the emacs 24.x series, but didn't track down >> the cause of the ultimate problem until now. The above worked in emacs 23.x. > > (I'm going through old bug reports that have unfortunately gotten no > responses yet.) > > I haven't looked at the low-level values passed here, but eval-ing that > form seems to do what you'd expect -- opening a frame at 100x100 (in > Emacs 27, at least). > > Has this started working again, or if not -- do you have a recipe that > will display the bug? Window managers are allowd to ingore normal hints, so YMMV. I fail to understand why gui_figure_window_size would ignore 'user-position' for the OP, though. martin