From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dmitri Minaev" Subject: Re: Org-mode version 5.13 Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:12:36 +0500 Message-ID: References: <877ili13ju.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071022223824.119eace4@newmanfamily.me.uk> <3BA1CB6B-5943-465C-A466-DA1B7BDC38F8@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Il0dm-0003sD-Bm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:12:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Il0dk-0003ng-K9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:12:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Il0dk-0003nR-GC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:12:40 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.190]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Il0dk-0001RV-4n for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 07:12:40 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so411464rvf for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:12:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3BA1CB6B-5943-465C-A466-DA1B7BDC38F8@science.uva.nl> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 10/24/07, Carsten Dominik wrote: > So, does everybody agree that I should remove the class from the divs > again? > Wouldn't classes make formatting more flexible? If I understand correctly, Mike Newman's proposal will require all formatting to be hardcoded into org.el? I'd rather keep it in a separate .css file, one for the whole site... -- With best regards, Dmitri Minaev Russian history blog: http://minaev.blogspot.com