From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Katsumi Yamaoka Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:34 +0900 Organization: Emacsen advocacy group Message-ID: References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361525760 21350 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2013 09:36:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 22 10:36:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p3D-00017A-UG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:36:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53748 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p2t-0004jj-BP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:35:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p2g-0004TV-7U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:35:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p2b-00020z-Re for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:35:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p2b-00020t-Mz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:35:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p3u-0006xN-1o; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Katsumi Yamaoka Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13321.136152576326674 (code B ref 13321); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2013 09:36:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p2x-0006wA-Fb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:36:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-hampton.hostforweb.net ([216.246.13.138]:43081 helo=hampton.hostforweb.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p2v-0006vm-6d for 13321@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:59738 helo=localhost) by hampton.hostforweb.net with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U8p1a-004M76-9A; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:34:38 -0600 X-Face: #kKnN,xUnmKia.'[pp`; Omh}odZK)?7wQSl"4o04=EixTF+V[""w~iNbM9ZL+.b*_CxUmFk B#Fu[*?MZZH@IkN:!"\w%I_zt>[$nm7nQosZ<3eu; B:$Q_:p!',P.c0-_Cy[dz4oIpw0ESA^D*1Lw= L&i*6&( User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=9C=9F?= Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (i686-pc-cygwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ag3VRXvRvAPXQSirWVcJMyqgTZk= X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hampton.hostforweb.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jpl.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: hampton.hostforweb.net: acl_c_authenticated_local_user: root X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71636 Archived-At: thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com wrote: > Katsumi Yamaoka writes: [...] >> I mean, if you perform a wide reply using the `F' or >> the `S W' command to a mail like the following: >> >> From: the-author@example.com.invalid >> To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid >> Cc: foo@example.com.invalid >> Reply-To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid >> >> The old one will compose a draft as follows: >> >> To: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid >> Cc: foo@example.com.invalid >> >> But the present one does: >> >> To: the-author@example.com.invalid >> Cc: the-mailing-list@example.com.invalid, foo@example.com.invalid >> >> This is much better for a wide reply, isn't it? [...] >> Is your problem that the From address is invalid? > Yes. >> If so, if there is a valid Reply-To header, you can use R rather than >> F. > Anyway even when hitting "F" this shouldn't happen. Please let me say that a wide reply doesn't contain the author of an original mail in the recipient list is a bug. To exclude an invalid address from a wide reply is not a feature; that is a rare exception that the poison is efficacious. Please imagine, a wide reply to your mail doesn't go to you only: (You send a mail) From: Thierry Volpiatto To: emacs-devel Cc: Lars Reply-To: emacs-devel (I reply to your mail) -> From: Katsumi Yamaoka To: emacs-devel Cc: Lars Reply-To: emacs-devel (You reply to my reply that you happen to find in Gmane) -> From: Thierry Volpiatto To: emacs-devel Cc: Lars Reply-To: emacs-devel (I don't notice it) Though the emacs-devel list doesn't add Reply-To, not a few lists do it. I don't think that GitHub doesn't use a valid address in the From header is a bad manner. But it should have a valid Reply-To if it allows a mail reply, or should have something like a link to a web form. >> Otherwise, feel free to forward an example mail to me. > Will (re)send in next post. Have you sent it already? If so, it may be delayed or... Anyway I don't need it now, maybe. > Here a patch that fix the problem, please review, I am not familiar with > all these mails headers. Unfortunately it's a regression. :( > Note that the second when clause is not needed when setting author > before, and don't corrupt further the "to" header when wide is not used. > Also my english is not very good, but I don't understand your comments, > please fix it (I leave long lines to see better). Sorry for my further poor English. [...] > - ;; [...]since Reply-To address may be a list address a mailing > - ;; list server added. I omitted a relative pronoun in front of "a mailing list server". Though I don't know whether it is barbarous, it is taught in Japan's school. ;-p Regards,