From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bolega Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Which is the best implementation of LISP family of languages for real world programming ? Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <19522f8e-d5b5-4b6f-942b-423602e44993@z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <87631qv9o5.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291839702 20648 80.91.229.12 (8 Dec 2010 20:21:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 20:21:42 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 08 21:21:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQQW6-0007QE-7G for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:21:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40041 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PQQW5-0003pb-JP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:21:33 -0500 Original-Path: usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help, comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.scheme, comp.lang.python, comp.lang.javascript Original-Lines: 23 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.31.65.198 Original-X-Trace: posting.google.com 1276212814 22143 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2010 23:33:34 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 23:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.31.65.198; posting-account=REkl4woAAABFXaU7nL79XtGpnmNCQ415 User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6,gzip(gfe) Original-Xref: usenet.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:178820 comp.lang.lisp:288923 comp.lang.scheme:86941 comp.lang.python:634611 comp.lang.javascript:603500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:75972 Archived-At: On Jun 10, 2:51=A0pm, p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) wrote: > bolega writes: > > Which is the best implementation of LISP family of languages for real > > world programming ? > > What's the real world? > What's real world programming? > > -- > __Pascal Bourguignon__ =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://www.= informatimago.com/ I mean ordinary people, who may want to do things with their computers for scripting, tasks that python can do, possibly when a language is weak and another has library, then use some function from there even if it is compiled. A set of work around techniques will always be needed. Things that perl does, python does, bash does etc. things like java applets for various animations etc. possibly some unoptimized but fast protyping of parsers to fix files or convert formats etc. a wide array of user tasks. Sorry, I dont intend any flame wars ... as a general statement ...