From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Adam Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] Wrong dependency headers for Ement v0.4 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 15:28:48 -0500 Message-ID: References: <85sfjfa7v0.fsf@elpa.gnu.org> <75b04605-f880-cfd3-3ee2-48603e741fab@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19621"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Cc: emacs-devel To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 22:30:35 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oo9WN-0004rR-08 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 22:30:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oo9V0-0008Fb-19; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oo9Up-0008F6-W1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.47]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oo9Uk-0004aI-1M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 16:28:59 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|inbox@alphapapa.net Original-Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84E81020DB; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 20:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a210 (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 736BF10226E; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 20:28:50 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1666902530; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=mSQie+7pCM1I5A9l2lpJr6+oGy5gwJ6R+VKV8XIILO88quKoZCQDdJIAdJuS+W8cNb70cR sOjZg3iF1f75b+rEpdBfg6GCf/ICV0ihILzdilCqboPBZebDkWLvPDvcDEqX4piaxjGK32 Wsk56pkTJ0x45wfLsvMnitNSgGNTe0DnFhoCZ3C9MK7gBYJ1WMcKWrJ6yJ1Eot86rVCEFw 810fKaRVm6pdpa4ICC9qtBIZXACPftcaOTLiR/rzdHYCwnQ27gGYE+n8gRvbcG6obX/Nnr NLwgA3rNsEfZgEpfrT6xJNf3BJrvSjc4hy+2kmCMldbHf2znPoKvxCDD3Fpubw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1666902530; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=MXAaGp4/SVuTQJQILBfCCJQxEhY0AhS4ZWuOz+2cWng=; b=lFWBdgO46fAYJ7O7t2YULw+gLfFpRzdXu69HFMtSI1io/6W+Q1TePXHHr7RAr7An/o7P5y up1WT3gjAavnmrScXSOyA1yu1CbRjSBUVbzRDEG1mk3qVa/6iaNuMnwOWd8W5sHeCMqvSR Sse6FbEdU9C3x8U77uBCt/oZ/4AM3zBouSIx5ilUfCoMGhiRNnG+58cLKzlT84U/hTcZ9Y H6KNaQgqYzLbPaxHa+55McMHXNWPbYW8XMLs3joPEmE4Gs7dSYHnjB3uBKB4IrROIMSYML p5hRygYREA/eI7L9W+fnDJnxXDtJQGoc3xiXV7eSlWk5K8geKIrQHqiqGLf1Hg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-7fb88f4dd5-bcmzq; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=adam@alphapapa.net X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|inbox@alphapapa.net X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|inbox@alphapapa.net X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Arithmetic-Towering: 659e9c602ff181ec_1666902530546_228950466 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1666902530545:3074271512 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1666902530545 Original-Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a210 (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.97.34.76 (trex/6.7.1); Thu, 27 Oct 2022 20:28:50 +0000 Original-Received: from [10.188.0.46] (unknown [193.56.117.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: inbox@alphapapa.net) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a210 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Myy1s6tStz92; Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:28:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alphapapa.net; s=dreamhost; t=1666902530; bh=MXAaGp4/SVuTQJQILBfCCJQxEhY0AhS4ZWuOz+2cWng=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=BOTPrFS4TXKQejrPkfTyinrL9zRvOtCuTX3dlGtWxyqh12kbNoCNwfzckhLp/qXlQ qTbN9y8PVSahka3tvG9ewKPBfveCV6oBLOfNiAy//gi/2u97dnotXTBdrbjA/3iSCm SH8MkrB3/g8Moy7WFqw0ndHI5CuIPJ7Fe0LUt7fJKcZD5FBm62vd7EOkiNxtxf4c9F cnhEUQAtkz5TaUSwcO2RBzHAywVBOYdzf6qNBfB439Rmp+8oQwn1Tysq6MQkbtJac9 c8+MUc9iSsReqMmYFEWUktn5rixikXLENN+pJzkuTJj7+vRpEfLdWkWgaBqU5XQ1nw CpgHtcrnqJ1Sw== Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: neutral client-ip=23.83.212.47; envelope-from=adam@alphapapa.net; helo=cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298643 Archived-At: On 10/27/22 15:18, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Well, it's good that it was finally discovered. :) > > And fixed, even! :D >>>> Given that, would it be possible to have ELPA build from a separate branch? >>>> That's how I organize some of my other packages, with a "stable" branch and >>>> a master branch. If ELPA pulled from a "stable" branch, I could push a fix >>>> to that while the next major version is still in development. >>> We can also do that, yes, using the `:release-branch`. >> >> Okay, that sounds good to me. Please see the attached patch to >> elpa-packages, which sets the release-branch to "stable". > > Done, thanks. > >> Will this patch cause the package to be rebuilt for v0.4, or do I need to >> make a v0.4.1 release to trigger that? > > There's already a 0.4 package, and by design, packages never(!) get > rebuilt, so you'll need to change `Version:`, yes. > [ And currently, changes on the release branch are only pulled as > a side-effect of pulling changes from the devel branch, so if you only > commit to the release branch, the package may wait for a while until > it's actually released. :-( ] Understood, so I just pushed v0.4.1 to the stable branch and then a new commit to the master branch, so IIUC that will guarantee a rebuild with v0.4.1 being released. Thanks for all your work!