From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: RE: The correspondence of the command-name and its key-sequence. Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 13:21:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <62acbe7b-18f5-4b76-9f05-265218a58db7@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10039"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: help-gnu-emacs To: Hongyi Zhao Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 09 22:22:28 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLgp-0002Vh-QZ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:22:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52912 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLgo-0004e7-S0 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:22:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLgO-0004dy-2A for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:22:00 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:37646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kyLgL-0007wi-VS for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2021 16:21:59 -0500 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 109LF7pc159478; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 21:21:51 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=6PzJQJ3EvUPSmweoX4P3kqcEb9cxKtnNjFbCrmccVvI=; b=NJMHERtec2oyhOGVfvZwa4Jx3Ud5h7vW+23LImVjOT84CsvLuxSNlVDxm+CiQb85vyhF sPWJ2S4oTH29MctvqBx8bo8VzYZSBh5GkhMLtAzP793YCG0sRzYq6t+42/k4nyXnCbwZ t2h1lbaD7mjHs3KBsBtulD99CHwav5s3qCQGnOzj/TCpLx/aGWSClVIdexi9/7frVluN 2BM7hqQ3jt2OGnT7bFISOLqc9wAnO0B49hfKF+ipw5ItMPYoZRu3esVhLbaSzNgzlzBz 2k7qwvD37Be/LGKOAVa5LboSdbUOr3t9gc7kofJDHdJb/IM/Mt2QpUJE4J7E4sBF0e0r PA== Original-Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35y4ekh70g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 09 Jan 2021 21:21:51 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 109LAnMe109367; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 21:21:51 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 35y2ha2w6n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 09 Jan 2021 21:21:51 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0006.oracle.com (abhmp0006.oracle.com [141.146.116.12]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 109LLmcU011405; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 21:21:50 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5095.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9859 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101090142 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9859 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101090142 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=141.146.126.78; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=aserp2120.oracle.com X-Spam_score_int: -46 X-Spam_score: -4.7 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.251, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:127149 Archived-At: Wrt `C-q' (besides what was said about quoting): If I remember right, at one point `C-s' and `C-q' in Emacs may have had the= ir traditional ASCII Control character behaviors of XOFF and XON. (At least I seem to remember _some_ keys doing that. Maybe it was `', usable as a toggle.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_flow_control ASCII Control character behaviors were a partial starting point for some Em= acs keys, I think. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII#Control_characters On the other hand, there may also have some influence from UNIX shell contr= ol chars (`C-c', `C-d'), though I don't recall anything specific. Some is history. Some is mnemonics. Some is ...