From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:55:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9b7orny.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1lupxyb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20724"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , thibaut.verron@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 13:56:45 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l80fE-0005Iw-Dp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 13:56:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36364 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l80fD-0002rT-8M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 07:56:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48710) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l80dm-0002IR-UK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 07:55:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]:37636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l80di-0004LL-M3; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 07:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id q2so8721957edi.4; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 04:55:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SXdFSRhH5mdQKenb9ZEZIqLPDlTFA3NWLRzz7ZBYEV4=; b=pUVg38Y6Z4dnT/usi4roQurTBIrjlRphkIyxTzm5l53DE9mAQ8Iqok3D+1q5BtgkcO jtUiPEpWwkAmTqoOBCMYVfGZKyfHecAiI6myeONU75faxeLK6g+qvvOcYvOrGT0qBKiv ifyYyqCMdPAUuoALI6e4gGlOFNTl8hAOpLDuSh6vHQwbKFMxLTyYb5ODju/zB1IXcS9k 7Q5ST6L7vFu/tYJQVaV4LTm+brrbMc+2Rm+dPFR0tKDdpJz1aRh/H3Sli2o/hiOnLvUS zohGmmik1shdRG48wCrpvOhuTKNNROL1q7rWawZ8PXwcZrs+6QOaBTTy4ezFx9CGSvZu yrdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SXdFSRhH5mdQKenb9ZEZIqLPDlTFA3NWLRzz7ZBYEV4=; b=fmDoI0x5ragbMEtQW5lkqGg+PjRQeaCsLzAwto0HGFHa2B00vmDhq/zFeSD0OVM1F/ ZDHTn+vOpF5m+i5h9oXFtq7XJKY3dwX+OQkP3c5tvHj6/IZB4m8BbQ9EJs7uuVGeZ8Cd Xgcf9NiU2gmervT8NNVTukIPPq8wRTn89po0Zh5wHRN54va4cBbvcZAbM3rCvZCbBwTt o4FupW6Cy7szKDK1ZmLd1jTkwO6GiwprX7lZ5LG4ZhbRq1P0AdyTpMUckROYDtUQGuJH x4XaxnjmoUoZItUlBFtA5MwQJ7tygPfNDkV1rFpqxHH5seXPQ1QGFe0WFubKIBbw42xm YfPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rc04aji+XJHjm8qnKAKJpburPq+YMLChttXts0TzAuQV1fedo yLKY9IVJ6zeqK8yt3PwMubqtArDJMFU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7ERtgHY0KN1y3H2Zc2NdxyRZIUZ0QF01MoFyUYK6gqNjHxeuoyn8YhagYdNbpg9tDnHyfBg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1ac2:: with SMTP id ba2mr1367284edb.81.1612529708124; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 04:55:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j5sm3934548edl.42.2021.02.05.04.55.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 04:55:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83r1lupxyb.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52c; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x52c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.33, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263984 Archived-At: On 05.02.2021 13:15, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> As far as I can tell, the suggestion of a poll was only metaphorical, > Then I guess I have trouble understanding written English, because to > me the demand to take a poll sounded very much as an explicit and > concrete one. It looked more like a question about the history of such requests rather than a demand to make a poll now.