From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57804: An infinite loop in a `fontify-region' function causes Emacs to hang indefinitely Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 20:44:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87pmfx6h7y.fsf@gnus.org> <2b58b8f5429a6e3aecda@heytings.org> <834jx85tyv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6379"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 57804@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Paul Pogonyshev Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 15 22:52:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oYvqq-0001SI-S3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 22:52:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55054 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYvqp-0005Rt-NC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:52:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYvjK-0004HV-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYvjK-0000WL-6i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYvjJ-00055c-UG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:45:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 20:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57804 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 57804-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57804.166327468819516 (code B ref 57804); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 20:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57804) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2022 20:44:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYvj5-00054i-MN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:44:47 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:43142) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYvj4-00054Y-4I for 57804@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:44:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1663274684; bh=ugypVm7vB+s/5V0HqzpI18aIE9bnUU0p5/Tl07p7aVU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=kCyJmSuJSWIsBgIB9Lnxc/JJjqqrhl+NhBuMC9hl6YaJlt1hawpl/gwIdBcLll7bp 2+ZFcvfZwDpPvEJpoEcLp5e3pCzQ2ild79PduDqgokIG00sicd6RASfwNywt01vFcx mEzgLtKPfmH7lhYP7ksan0rKGMq52/29iYiNXhvtOWN+KAWQ9VyfvLGO5SFoAJMZDr 8NsH7dm+rDf8TzteRlSaN/pXoh0/EtDrFJdI6IJ8opW1/MCNSsscluUlNqEkZe0JFA cpXneeWdVkC7MGdruldwKBjwXy6jz+jHqHxcWq961DMRckp8cJVYQ9wWRM/Q0Szo8g 0A4fag/ChmgpQ== In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242650 Archived-At: >> No, if your function is called inside fontification-functions, you will >> not have to monitor Emacs sources, your code will use a single tag, >> namely 'fontification-functions. > > So, I will be able to unlock? > Yes. > > Let Logview behave against your recommendations. And then, when the > users discover how crappy and unresponsive it is, as a result, compared > to everything else, they will just uninstall the package and use > something better. > Given that you will be able to unlock, that will be possible.