From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #22983 (syntax-ppss returns wrong result) is still open. Could we fix it before the release, please. Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:32:44 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20160607220928.GA5155@acm.fritz.box> <20160611102419.GC2776@acm.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465662781 16380 80.91.229.3 (11 Jun 2016 16:33:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 18:33:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlqE-0006yg-Rq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:32:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47766 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlqE-0005Ne-4a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlq8-0005NO-Jv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:32:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlq3-0005Z9-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:32:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]:35858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlq3-0005Xq-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:32:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id n184so27197565wmn.1 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:32:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uqbgKQaHLJ+E0vYQDNfYjgKSFyJapEyy+IUGP8d0rqg=; b=zs0n6+6SF2ta30p1d9a4L1eD/iylQEKcDJ/KaGIumnssyIJcNbhw+IVma4glUrFftd xMORbQ0sJobIItXJWsURbuONlq8BGRuQkBrOpwUt1n7mn0GO9g44KFZt898ChZ/chTOt KxCmEoWKlZW2F0q9jHiYf7yjolkcNL9/Tz6TkKI69jkoMXJJk/XHyphz2J3Fj5WAQBGs dZWPVuDtrjkI3bJhAtRlt/qlhr3cmSSUtkbRvBvX5hF8bE9NOTh4UtqAUKyBo3LeQRUV TNT7h19sAQSysYzxr2Mg2auUVppRy8eU6XhdWsSFNbGdudm2Zw5jRdo2Zg/fqbdG6sHB KLhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uqbgKQaHLJ+E0vYQDNfYjgKSFyJapEyy+IUGP8d0rqg=; b=iZBCiAEM3T24GlnKHZGK0rNtU1WUvmGpmVrir6e821+shXNzKxHXzeIi2dzKyu8SY5 qd8I+fweeI/u8rJ8SEpP1t4Hi0MqTZ/4p12n1KiufupKGRvV4gcVB5K95s58ntUQC2eI CD334hhqQmvOkntJ7m0k+G+EnGBEF1YVt/TgLGXOb7woPPhoBcvUiypojgZ2PfpCHIEw hzozyDdYFwu8vkn6wr8g/u8ZZ6h3TyN0SAi2CYKtWOqrBiqkh7fzT/EZDRciet+vz+6V mCnmJvkT4aXQJCqqcwZAvXlj7EHZ4Ujc2MqYxivDvltDBADpwbPNz41Qy2mBW13s+dbQ b5Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKMO/PfvKrD9dkJ/ldBVGjxEk75U/a1qJRbpCSY4n2qLg1Jg9YaM7WwSzW9QjP4NQ== X-Received: by 10.194.75.134 with SMTP id c6mr7825662wjw.103.1465662766415; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.173.135]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id zg2sm18158874wjb.1.2016.06.11.09.32.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:32:45 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 In-Reply-To: <20160611102419.GC2776@acm.fritz.box> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204287 Archived-At: On 06/11/2016 01:24 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > font-lock-dont-widen is ugly indeed. Maybe syntax-ppss-base could be a > bit less ugly. The latter can't be the full replacement for the former: a) font-lock-dont-widen is used well before syntax-ppss-base would take effect. In particular, it affects the result of font-lock-extend-region-functions. b) font-lock-dont-widen helps with both upper and lower bounds on the buffer position. syntax-ppss-base would only describe one.