From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56682: locked narrowing Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 20:59:07 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83r11gdrr4.fsf@gnu.org> <83edxfds7s.fsf@gnu.org> <83r11fc80o.fsf@gnu.org> <83o7wjc6o2.fsf@gnu.org> <83lernc5gu.fsf@gnu.org> <83k076dd7d.fsf@gnu.org> <83czcyd8jf.fsf@gnu.org> <83a682d66r.fsf@gnu.org> <837d36ceno.fsf@gnu.org> <37dd2827f54f8bbda5e3@heytings.org> <735c1d5b-0d64-a8e1-3aaa-91fc0248abd3@yandex.ru> <97049541-f5b4-ed3b-b8de-7c0bdc86f0f5@yandex.ru> <6e305c9b-7702-133a-3347-f64db05ade3f@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17966"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56682@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 29 22:00:39 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p07iZ-0004V9-Gl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 22:00:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p07iL-0007P3-Cf; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:00:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p07i1-0007Lu-7g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p07i0-00032W-MQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:00:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p07hy-0000fj-Hk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56682 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56682-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56682.16697555522545 (code B ref 56682); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56682) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2022 20:59:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56303 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p07h9-0000ez-LL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:59:11 -0500 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:36726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p07h6-0000et-RV for 56682@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:59:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1669755547; bh=EL7Xve8vFIxVNfLXgYxhx4KFit4oS3NSDJFyuVQkwnc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=Z0aGVpR2e07C3ikQm4TM6IPv415pHA9Yu/UdRygXJA6NvoBAMoOYTmFNK4ksRXUr2 fcdQYa4cKRv1UEcNuRi0sRcRBkvz7WKYfBMdFy34CNO0Ow085/vQXpCbVv9AdBA/FS 4mNdf4H58nHOa9EFyRX2q/If7GgRBmumQPfUU6PcJlhLEtflPRYULp64EcrFTZZpnx UWtmVScbYsPbfgtYMD2tM0posSD5nMyXGxqO5mQeE3RJYMV7jTPdpIbx1V9lT7xWAX 6vSVhjFativfczrWCWmMvmQLrD0Xj48TZU8PlxPZAqksz/C4ZpmG446Lwy4LTOS9HU lpvR4nWQ6fCBw== In-Reply-To: <6e305c9b-7702-133a-3347-f64db05ade3f@yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249441 Archived-At: > > The result will be that the benchmark will report ~30ms both near BOB > and near EOB. So the long-lines-threshold thingy adds a regression here. > It's not a regression, it's the price we agreed to pay to detect whether the buffer contains long lines. That detection happens dynamically, to catch cases when long lines are inserted in a buffer. > > Again, not trying to criticize or anything, but a 100ms is usually > considered as something that brings an operation from appearing > "instantaneous" down to "noticeable delay". > I don't think your benchmark is representative. While (benchmark-run 1 (progn (insert "a") (redisplay t))) does take 100 ms, Emacs remains responsive when I type as fast as I can (which is faster than 10 characters per second), and I do not see any delays.