-------- Original Message -------- From: Eli Zaretskii Sent: Thu Dec 19 12:46:48 GMT 2024 To: "Gerd Möllmann" Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: master 8aef5d224a6: Merge branch 'scratch/tty-child-frames' > From: Gerd Möllmann > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:59:44 +0100 > > Michael Albinus writes: > > > Gerd Moellmann writes: > > > > Hi Gerd, > > > >> Merge branch 'scratch/tty-child-frames' > >> > >> Add support for child frames on tty > > > > This breaks xt-mouse-tests: > > > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > # make -C test xt-mouse-tests > > Test xt-mouse-tracking-basic condition: > > (error "tty frame should be used") > > FAILED 1/3 xt-mouse-tracking-basic (0.776520 sec) at lisp/xt-mouse-tests.el:61 > > Test xt-mouse-tracking-sgr condition: > > (error "tty frame should be used") > > FAILED 2/3 xt-mouse-tracking-sgr (0.000466 sec) at lisp/xt-mouse-tests.el:102 > > Test xt-mouse-tracking-utf-8 condition: > > (error "tty frame should be used") > > FAILED 3/3 xt-mouse-tracking-utf-8 (0.000746 sec) at lisp/xt-mouse-tests.el:80 > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > > > Best regards, Michael. > > Hi Michael, > > The new code now _requires_ a tty frame to be used (decode_tty_frame, > check_tty), which I think the tests can't provide, running in batch. And > I'd rather not be less picky for the sake of these tests. Why is that a problem? A batch session does have a frame, you just need to account for that. I think the test that emits the error is too strict, and should be relaxed when noninteractive is non-zero. Or maybe invert the test and check for !FRAME_WINDOW_P (which would then allow the frame that exists in the batch session).