From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:32:58 -0500 Message-ID: References: <47396EDD.6020007@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195018395 7668 80.91.229.12 (14 Nov 2007 05:33:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 14 06:33:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IsAsJ-00025R-Ar for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:33:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IsAs6-0001iR-PZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:33:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IsAs3-0001i8-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:33:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IsAs1-0001hf-TH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IsAs1-0001hc-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IsAs0-00017S-Sg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IsAry-0003Oj-SX; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:32:58 -0500 X-Spook: brigand monarchist Cohiba Vickie Weaver afsatcom BATF X-Ran: ~L[$[/Db"`F=o0V$Klv*'Qx|-F/@C_wO5K,^n]Db:$lGs*j0s+23xhMnU/6S\v5Fc+:t/Q X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <47396EDD.6020007@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:31:09 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83164 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: > `checkdec' will be likely confused more often with `checkdoc'. I think > a different term should be used. I suppose it is a bit similar. Any suggestions anyone? > Also, wouldn't it be reasonable to add `declare-variable' as well? > I'm not arguing for consistency here. But we could get rid of > comments talking about "byte-compiler warnings" or "pacify > byte-compiler". And the intention of some `(defvar variable)'s > without such comments would become more clear. Personally I don't have a problem with `(defvar foo)'.