From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay slower in Emacs 28 than Emacs 27 Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 18:49:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <877dptiro7.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn3lhcdd.fsf@gnus.org> <878sa9hbe2.fsf@gnus.org> <877dptfvae.fsf@gnus.org> <83czzl8qwu.fsf@gnu.org> <87sg8h78s8.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14384"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 07 19:50:53 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmLb1-0003cq-G7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 19:50:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmLb0-00062J-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:50:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmLZl-00055A-9E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:49:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:51745) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kmLZh-0008Kp-91; Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:49:32 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@faeroes.freeshell.org [205.166.94.9]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 0B7InOoq006074 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:49:24 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 0B7InO1L029556; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:49:24 GMT In-Reply-To: <87sg8h78s8.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260509 Archived-At: >> That being said, it seems to me that this slowdown is avoidable. Lars >> considers that the minor modification he made should not have changed >> anything. > > Would it be possible for you to run the benchmarks on the current trunk, > with and without that "!"? Because I just don't understand why > disabling the image cache would make Emacs slower. > Sure, I'll do that.