From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New multi-command facility displays in the wrong echo area. Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:36:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20201009163445.GB4027@ACM> <20201009203810.GC4027@ACM> <83imbi609a.fsf@gnu.org> <20201010103233.GB5662@ACM> <834kn25o6b.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Gregory Heytings Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28409"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 10 14:37:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kRE87-0007Ju-GT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:37:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57504 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRE86-0002bg-J5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 08:37:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRE7I-0002Aj-DT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 08:36:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:53772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRE7G-0003nT-1a; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 08:36:52 -0400 Original-Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:ghe@otaku.sdf.org [205.166.94.8]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 09ACajBg003396 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:36:45 GMT Original-Received: (from ghe@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id 09ACb6VE022237; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 12:37:06 GMT In-Reply-To: <834kn25o6b.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=ghe@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/10 08:36:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257319 Archived-At: > > Does that work if you set tty-menu-open-use-tmm non-nil, then press f10 > while the I-search: prompt is active? This is one case where Isearch > reads from the minibuffer. > This gives "Command attempted to use minibuffer while in minibuffer", with earlier and current Emacs versions, with or without the bugfix. > > Another, perhaps more important, use case is when you type "M-s e" > during Isearch: that enters the minibuffer to let you edit the search > string. > This gives "Command attempted to use minibuffer while in minibuffer", with earlier and current Emacs versions, with or without the bugfix. > > Yet another similar use case is when you type "C-x 8 RET" during > Isearch: that reads the character's name/codepoint from the minibuffer. > This one works (the active minibuffer is moved to the current frame), with earlier and current Emacs versions, with or without the bugfix. In short: these three use cases are orthogonal to the problem at hand, they are not improved or worsened by the bugfix.