From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jude DaShiell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: re: web design Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 23:46:40 -0500 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1514868322 17968 195.159.176.226 (2 Jan 2018 04:45:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 04:45:22 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 02 05:45:18 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eWERx-0004KR-DP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 05:45:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56627 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWETw-0004Qr-FM for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 23:47:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWETT-0004Qg-52 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 23:46:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWETO-0002DK-5F for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 23:46:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailbackend.panix.com ([166.84.1.89]:35736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eWETO-000253-1T for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2018 23:46:46 -0500 Original-Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489473292F for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 23:46:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by panix1.panix.com (Postfix, from userid 20712) id 2FCDE14B9D; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 23:46:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panix1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C95714B98 for ; Mon, 1 Jan 2018 23:46:40 -0500 (EST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux (Android) [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 166.84.1.89 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:115525 Archived-At: html-tidy can certainly check web site grammar and perhaps repair it too. I write perhaps since I suspect it is entirely possible to write an html site so badly that not even html-tidy could repair the site. One possible direction gnu tools might take in the future would be in terms of scripts first to install when necessary Linux tools and use those locally then send site files out for further checking and perhaps processing and collect those the external sites processed for the developers. Multiple subdirectories with names of internal and external tools on them could hold the processed content as the content got processed and returned. It would then be up to the site developers to review what was returned in each subdirectory to find if any of the processing tools made unacceptable errors. html-tidy I consider a hybrid since the tool can check and slso repair web site files as opposed to w3cvalidator which so far as I know only checks web site files. My nephew who could use Windows prefers Linux for his web development he does for other companies so if any of this starts happening I think he'll be very interested and may even be making some technical contributions sooner or later. --