From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Angelo Graziosi Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pure space overflow (Cygwin) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:55:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <837gqm22ol.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350662150 11269 80.91.229.3 (19 Oct 2012 15:55:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Angelo Graziosi , Ken Brown , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 17:55:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TPEvU-00062T-5m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:55:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPEvN-0000EX-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:55:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48437) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPEvK-0000Bk-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:55:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPEvJ-0000GG-Ao for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:55:46 -0400 Original-Received: from postino4.roma1.infn.it ([141.108.26.222]:53989) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TPEvC-0000Ci-Nd; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:55:38 -0400 Original-Received: from postinoauth1.roma1.infn.it (postinoauth1.roma1.infn.it [141.108.26.53]) by postino4.roma1.infn.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9JFtSBt027537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:55:29 +0200 (envelope-from Angelo.Graziosi) Original-Received: from login1.roma1.infn.it (login1.roma1.infn.it [141.108.26.33]) by postinoauth1.roma1.infn.it (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9JFtS2l005677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:55:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <837gqm22ol.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (postino4.roma1.infn.it [141.108.26.222]); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:55:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (postinoauth1.roma1.infn.it [141.108.26.53]); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:55:28 +0200 (CEST) X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2012.10.19.154517 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report=' MULTIPLE_RCPTS 0.1, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_700_799 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_RCPTS_CC_X2 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0' X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 141.108.26.222 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154444 Archived-At: On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:51:17 +0200 (CEST) >> From: Angelo Graziosi >> >> >> Ken Brown wrote: >> >>> I can't speak for Angelo, but I had to increase it by 2250 to make the >>> warning go away on my Cygwin build. (This is the regular build, not >>> the Cygw32 build.) >> >> I will try only in this week-end... :-( > > I bumped the base value by 80000, so it should solve your problem. ...now the warning is gone... Ciao, Angelo. > Perhaps Ken should look into tuning SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA (on > conf_post.h) for Cygwin, since no other system seems to have this > problem at this time. > >