From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30285: dired-do-chmod vs. top line of dired Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 08:12:11 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <87mv0wg80c.fsf@jidanni.org> <87efm8snnr.fsf@gmail.com> <83efm8irac.fsf@gnu.org> <87d11sl08v.fsf@gmail.com> <87fu6lwxxu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1517785891 3810 195.159.176.226 (4 Feb 2018 23:11:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 23:11:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: 30285@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha , jidanni@jidanni.org, Juri Linkov To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 05 00:11:26 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiTRE-00082y-N2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:11:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51731 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiTTF-0004LB-JP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:13:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51808) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiTT9-0004Ht-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:13:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiTT4-0002CR-Jz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:13:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eiTT4-0002CM-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiTT4-0006fA-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:13:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 23:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30285 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 30285-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30285.151778594325568 (code B ref 30285); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 23:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30285) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2018 23:12:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57479 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiTSR-0006eK-2i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:12:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]:42201) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eiTSO-0006e1-RG for 30285@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:12:21 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id m28so368387pgc.9 for <30285@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:12:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=loxXO8Kog+dmbKrjeafv2Dt+rgY5EyO21MpoLJXMiy4=; b=TRLERhFO6fnKrKB+UwbT0cSb7yWTGFO9ax+z6o73uFbixFo6gpLlw91pbMONtowrfC 4dmJ8ZJZFXSN0kxJWVSXoLVAG0RYYRr6PE9Bg7euDR0PVYDrqC+5XwParHYNdEeKCAPf WxpKtcsSCTDQ6QXZlVDZDZr710ULP90qf1H2FH/pRbDb69Mztrse4X3ks7MjpGGgNYqG mCtnu8kl91i0K5tmA6pJVJMfxv5qv9pWMJjCemYXbl1RnfKjBiE9WQZTbGhE9ioo5nwk VQ11LzznUYfaYkAK1mMuWKQl0bPV0iPPl1NiMi9EXypsX96gLkBzirrigTttFVzrpiTU cWfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=loxXO8Kog+dmbKrjeafv2Dt+rgY5EyO21MpoLJXMiy4=; b=qN7FZq1MaKDXoc5i9DQXN8neWaPFUDaZvtbTQZRIKTCgTad32Jk9X+oHvM95hIlPV+ WLJDxQnNKih2JzaKQdoULHzGS+9hzz9H5QRCzLpV1WHkNl0aThqf+5bQpcBQtozufP5K A3KdrvasgjK3mHystFZKjQkWcBX+BGnqmmPz8Q9OV64hxJO/1SvEQgYpPtJztyYLUORs ol8IWF3MrvLRBU0+ziT91xvyNMeIurOC7YE74n5310DQoZ9jZgSx9WYW8XvpxOodzQuu 7AeZIIxQW9r3ukPGuEH6LEwsjpGkMSMUvnbAQ4OhJz9RoIntMYNBq2yDjpRjn8r7PvUd MSdg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPB92CFZ3wVQEAHn7YA0KHhd19PKC74JONZB0i6WNqhH3BkDosZ1 9jyH7ckqzupgiJZXuLVG+Nc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227u3cvs9+4pe/o0+hzUKUs/nc84XkGYJhZ0KURnBrNkSIpK3+SefM0kr/HUcIlr7EsgdbOVNg== X-Received: by 10.99.116.22 with SMTP id p22mr4280376pgc.89.1517785935412; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:12:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (FL1-125-193-170-29.tky.mesh.ad.jp. [125.193.170.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l188sm11609085pgl.72.2018.02.04.15.12.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 15:12:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142918 Archived-At: On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Drew Adams wrote: >> I would like all `dired-do...' commands behave the same under the >> 'X condition': * called from the top line ** no marked files. > > I've already said that it's not only about the top line. > It's about the ordinary Dired situation of not being on a > file line. Plenty of Dired code already deals (simply) > with this "X condition". Sorry for the confussion: I thought it was prety obvious that 'X condition' was akind of summary of what the patch was doing. It would be as easy as to read my commit message to realize that; or take a quick look in the diff I provided (dont need even to test it). Then, you would be talking about my work, not about what you guess it is my work. For the future, please try to at least read my commit messages before make lot of observations about one patch that you didn't even read at all. Thanks! :-)