From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27940: Recursively delete dir34? (yes, no, all, quit) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 14:54:32 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <87o9rwxmfz.fsf@jidanni.org> <87r2wrkacy.fsf@calancha-pc> <83a83fybrc.fsf@gnu.org> <87vam365q2.fsf@calancha-pc> <834ltnxzyz.fsf@gnu.org> <871sorz9kg.fsf@calancha-pc> <83tw1nwfhp.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2wppabm.fsf@calancha-pc> <87k22e9obk.fsf@ctlt579.codethink.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1502258123 15399 195.159.176.226 (9 Aug 2017 05:55:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 05:55:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: 27940@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Robert Marshall Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 09 07:55:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dfJxb-0003YH-Lt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 07:55:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45789 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfJxi-0006oE-2N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 01:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56548) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfJxR-0006SX-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 01:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfJxO-0005HI-OA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 01:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dfJxO-0005HD-KL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 01:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dfJxN-0002ne-Q9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 01:55:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27940 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27940-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27940.150225808410736 (code B ref 27940); Wed, 09 Aug 2017 05:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27940) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2017 05:54:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52514 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dfJx6-0002n6-3l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 01:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:37932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dfJx4-0002mr-JP for 27940@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 01:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f65.google.com with SMTP id f16so4034976itb.5 for <27940@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 22:54:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=JEyFYUwgVbFe3jHs29aiQsrkFPujVYMJ+6x4KUbuZH4=; b=cC9ZCjg671M3NCeNrQ1GGMDRfw3x2J8/VDHcW6CENYrsrYCr6UUQ4tos+MQAUuURCo vLQr++pxL1kI8XjgI5iJArPwmXkSiFjVmDb/oero03BRYyMRCv66rVoltePatocDn+JO dEsFM1p1o6GQLZ+HFDzGHjBfjkasy1ZkH4vdinihRhV5RA+9wChnj1dUyOXPg4sY2eTO GK/M6Q3B3L1C3IULbARcXBisn8WYxqCmr7rh+22pOSzZP90O7e7KYQMGevxddF1+9+Zd vZ/enN/vqr4zOlKDTMemiDFnNBshOLEJlrdChLD1ipLMbz2XNLLAmvkGx2iiGoccPeqv F1EA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JEyFYUwgVbFe3jHs29aiQsrkFPujVYMJ+6x4KUbuZH4=; b=LNTXBlLooBbl4zEhXurqTbl861QzOHBTfk3Zj3S1R/4Io9YE6eDNIWr+D8lB9Uwp5i aTtpfVCIKZ1rq9cqVT8Xrq3/YZiGVNIcC0AzasaSHJkhwMgoVZJT26QJR5AhWNQaKwds bqn0/cGyC5Il2WyELOrS+5/9GlGWjb7oe6dTxsk7CJtP4lXtk6onHQGukCLvFMeNkVMK sCPNUGGGvGr0eJP1mUfFP4DrM/J0AeWkfSSiwjGxS3CgiAIo4TO7rGi2v+6GqohyS7UF v/aEVyj14SpOEh95xn/Rpv1NePP/BUCtm90P6iNfZlbZwaZ6X7lFRjTybbJ2ZqlLcTWK 9Idw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jT0CH/nb1tUCY7lifjGDJEBzl1dK+k+2lUGnRLKXgvkM1Jp1Ti 8qv2bXOJvWoTCw== X-Received: by 10.36.154.3 with SMTP id l3mr6598120ite.20.1502258076724; Tue, 08 Aug 2017 22:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (170.224.128.101.dy.bbexcite.jp. [101.128.224.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r18sm1506550ioe.78.2017.08.08.22.54.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Aug 2017 22:54:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <87k22e9obk.fsf@ctlt579.codethink.co.uk> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:135588 Archived-At: On Tue, 8 Aug 2017, Robert Marshall wrote: > Tino Calancha writes: > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >>>>> This warrants a NEWS entry, I think. I also wonder whether we should >>>>> describe this in the user manual, under "Dired Deletion". >>>> Done. >>> >>> Thanks, LGTM. >> Added feature into master branch as commit >> cbea38e5c4af5386192fb9a48ef4fca5080d6561 >> (dired-do-delete: Allow to delete dirs recursively without prompts) > > Hi > > With this change deleting an empty directory now asks for confirmation > whereas it didn't before and answering no to the recursively delete > question still deletes the directory, which seems a bit counter > intuitive? > > Robert Thank you very much. I believe commit da4438e14f1c55808937872b6d651a807404daa2 (dired-delete-file: Dont't ask for empty dirs) has fixed it.