From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27940: Recursively delete dir34? (yes, no, all, quit) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 01:34:17 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <<87o9rwxmfz.fsf@jidanni.org>> <<87r2wrkacy.fsf@calancha-pc> <83a83fybrc.fsf@gnu.org>> <<87vam365q2.fsf@calancha-pc> <834ltnxzyz.fsf@gnu.org>> <<871sorz9kg.fsf@calancha-pc>> <<83tw1nwfhp.fsf@gnu.org>> <4ad9397b-7771-4914-85a3-9dd0e998fa0c@default> <3b5babc7-324e-437b-88a1-c234b883c257@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501865792 5715 195.159.176.226 (4 Aug 2017 16:56:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 16:56:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: 27940@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha , jidanni@jidanni.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 04 18:56:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ddftf-000146-OL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 18:56:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33985 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddftl-0003zh-T6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:56:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddfZ4-0007LX-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddfZ1-0007Xy-2H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ddfZ0-0007XO-TB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ddfZ0-00055B-IM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 16:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27940 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27940-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27940.150186446919491 (code B ref 27940); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 16:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27940) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2017 16:34:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ddfYT-00054I-EG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:34:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:35790) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ddfYR-000546-DA for 27940@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 12:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id v189so9963770pgd.2 for <27940@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:34:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Mgy6nKj8urv1sq1J8xZjtNo8g2RbAS5EAqkhJXqVFOI=; b=NCdNnzS55w2Rw191W5lNCaR/qa9+OT1LLYlStrT1bOUkLp6pvB0t9p4KZ1xPAsJjab GjUYV2NHNBR0gPjRq+eMNdL5VfnzYR5AXvey9r0w4GIBFgbF4OMfQrj/eOb5IcousZKo kU5qEqOlyKHkQ8I98vBzkqI+3tIzKp6ltBFeZ8kBq7cT7qFS+x4xVmL1aTJD4UOtVTBu QHtPiOeA9FWrkjc6I9DVOYvEmXHX/qYUt33MfVnnl5qeHz2ZbqJIywGLu1bEKrnpJWc7 L8ehhe5lX/U6Qnt7U4wfIORSLcOSwDyiRJNdxySpCjokILQ2hhgtH1yRAueos6KFZ69h 4O9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Mgy6nKj8urv1sq1J8xZjtNo8g2RbAS5EAqkhJXqVFOI=; b=nCBLigf1stvbCco6Imb22sjVg6zwOAiESvGHXvWIMri6CebzigWxw+hDo4yXr82yCC swWXktWTYpHLj3SutR5sh933UOfgI9lKipRjZCxvdFs9zl4xMeTnTt4EaAYx1vrwwHao YVdqKCkgwovcdWngaptors8AG6VaE7YIrrlf5hO6qXpVvlOxFT3WRKvti0ulGn2o2RqU puGtwU4NkfBDHHTYJA6IKsc9sjGWpWM+0MUDs+x6pwMnelvVf8S5JJnrD9Tbl59C1Iwd FV4NLPkjjd2a2Qb7+CmcIUA0g7SW5dqFhTAMT8vOqRjAwnv3kTichH3eYrVfCCjYi45j mm9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110GNawZvsn8oaFw4VW9sVo1Rtw1hV29S4J0r2IZSzIwP5Gi5x4f 3J+fQ4vjT27I/A== X-Received: by 10.84.216.25 with SMTP id m25mr3525979pli.420.1501864461530; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (170.224.128.101.dy.bbexcite.jp. [101.128.224.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u1sm4210584pfk.31.2017.08.04.09.34.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:34:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <3b5babc7-324e-437b-88a1-c234b883c257@default> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:135351 Archived-At: On Fri, 4 Aug 2017, Drew Adams wrote: >>> Is it a good idea to mix `yes-or-no-p'-style (minibuffer) input, >>> such as `yes' and `no', with `read-char'-style input, such as `!' >>> and `q'? I don't think so, a priori. Especially for `!', which >>> has worse repercussions in case of a mistake than does `y'. No? >> Agreed. If you see my first answer i was reluctant to allow the dangerous >> operation. >> I will use "all" and "quit" instead of "!", "q". >> >> * Question: >> Do we need to show the help after this change? > > I would say yes, for the help. Think of `yes-or-no-p'. > If you type `foo' to `yes-or-no-p' it helps you. Here > we should offer more help, explaining the possibilities. I see. Thank you for the explanation!