From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27584: 26.0.50; alist-get: Add optional arg TESTFN Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 21:28:21 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <87tw2rva7v.fsf@calancha-pc> <87mv8j6y1z.fsf@petton.fr> <87y3s2m76v.fsf@calancha-pc> <8737a83fq6.fsf@calancha-pc> <87van033d5.fsf@drachen> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499689753 19387 195.159.176.226 (10 Jul 2017 12:29:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:29:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: Nicolas Petton , Tino Calancha , 27584@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 10 14:29:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUXoJ-0004ii-NV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:29:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40544 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUXoP-0003nb-72 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:29:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58298) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUXoI-0003m9-W3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUXoE-00021B-3P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUXoD-00020v-V5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUXoD-0006Yx-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27584 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27584-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27584.149968971325175 (code B ref 27584); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27584) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jul 2017 12:28:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59714 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUXnl-0006Xz-1L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:28:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:36791) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUXnk-0006Xl-4A for 27584@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 08:28:32 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f65.google.com with SMTP id u36so12536305pgn.3 for <27584@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:28:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=4RirRJDfhWxE2u76oIrrISWL1ziYcH74VXsH+Jp3tU4=; b=Wseo3lImprQazs+s2Mwf26865ew/cAb8EkuZAQPr+ID/eGBo9pelq/vTkJKXlNjmZA badKtNWUyM4NtMvKuXtr4VF2zM7g+iBfMFcUrmBWcYw0OBmcUwX42t80vZR177jrHsBf O0E83nMtCmZPQUff5/RRf+4y99G/DS6MuHnNQUo7XyoqmCzbC86L4zOovEUKRZqIGxXk cWrXxnEwCQiKhm/8y2kUjNWkXMKpXOFt0BvgqCWnhx0lnjilh0VfP2OpcRV8rkuqh3lP almiQG1daZ+a1I0cvgomu52nK1HEe1FPwjQRel9DZtYSAHR/KAt9micU1c435Lw26bzc XW5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4RirRJDfhWxE2u76oIrrISWL1ziYcH74VXsH+Jp3tU4=; b=AGV10gjEmwCAvOUpnDt0RT056R2gcMMt0Yt8Dw6xJdQKa/9LO/YtXwRV57cp+FR3T1 xtxqt6rNuKkAAvVf5lV8Wm4Jrze1C644UAZGX0SDFGSAJuyjKTQYCip1l7DBq+VtRhBx zRcmv0xryLq0BvXxdbWx1ogLGVJaIwncu6FXYh1ScvOyPq5+CnX0JB7ABp4JN4POpnW/ wx/P+LKlX1P9WYdUcdHduDfvOb9oNJG7lSe/yz4rc30z5i6PD6HWoOGI6kk0bzIhb7Lw uLDYQYbyABea679UXAQiMRDHGex9P1EstaYYQX/Ac3Kp1RL5DQRyrZr7ck91KAAxnMnD 4fFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110E55xNmBdwS+7mUzkbtb0dw2ImPaP5+JekhWo7DgnXMHRqk82r nzb603ZlET1q8w== X-Received: by 10.98.64.129 with SMTP id f1mr22254327pfd.225.1499689706053; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (170.224.128.101.dy.bbexcite.jp. [101.128.224.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k194sm19939075pgc.31.2017.07.10.05.28.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Jul 2017 05:28:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <87van033d5.fsf@drachen> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134391 Archived-At: On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Tino Calancha writes: > >> But we know that: >> (macroexp-const-p (let ((x 999)) x)) >> => t > > Aren't you just missing a quote before the expression? That's right, the compiler macro see '(let ((x 999)) that explains my example: (macroexp-const-p '(let ((x 999)) x)) => nil I am a bit fooled by the docstring of `macroexp-const-p'. "Return non-nil if EXP will always evaluate to the same value." Consider the expression: (setq exp '(let ((x 999)) x)) This will always be evaluated to 999: (eval exp) => 999 Then, I would expect `macroexp-const-p' return non-nil on this expressio, but it doesn't.