From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:55:12 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323329-315051154-1485928515=:7008" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485928567 815 195.159.176.226 (1 Feb 2017 05:56:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 05:56:07 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: Jordon Biondo , Emacs development discussions To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 06:56:04 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYnti-0008IH-Ok for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:56:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42874 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYntl-0006MO-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:56:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58725) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYnt5-0006M8-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:55:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYnt1-0001t5-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:55:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]:32903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYnt0-0001t0-Sx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 00:55:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id y143so115884061pfb.0 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:55:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=jgTEol0SPHTg2lLGYEdSLyfLWQOKvVXRcGqs0d08AkQ=; b=SyVl+IpQq+ICVja7wkJY4s6RR7gX8C1OU+uOBmTIUhXf/dXJL62gsLwZn8wGYL2h7S ld17KHNI3YFJEd9FW/iGTed4dHvtLJrybnjGCcd/fWkaShq/muaNG2vPibTHE21IZp8m AnfPcNxSOe9BvoHLW2R3MnncwRiBhA+/RFaMyRIToHiM3kN/ICeu00pw7CWje0SSYc4P vRPBdIXZdWyNFCqn98D+4PuTmis1dHrZzVeL/tueJIuZUeBon3OdLFP60WqYq+oUL9f2 wjbWresgH8DU39JQ4sofjQH3+tmgxpHrQOOqbfDoLkthjNqIm0hO/pYUQNei4ARf2Dny s9ow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=jgTEol0SPHTg2lLGYEdSLyfLWQOKvVXRcGqs0d08AkQ=; b=YdB+p2fI3TW33X/yg8m1HKyg1rpjgQQyiYyOLoch1I7wgRgHDmihp4RCIm6Fd3yJa1 gZnyyLEzTTky5ypH8AwIob/S21sG47qXjHDfobZuy3o99JaRDN4F2XUIzymggD1A5abe OgrNsE0VeFle0yWgR9YWask4Li+TEhvxZzFdtGmv1e2DaXiMiO4kfTakTiGKLG4ry67I 1UufQfFdXEsgq3CwcjctxCi5SFYhuo1wzhG8FKssohChQ4X2RxoIluT5/GL1CB8+94gE vMeJ8031wfr4yhRgUdPhrRY2mFsaJOb9dbVAXjWUcf7r2Nt47+fZfzuHDtYvLHBsWV3d iL5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKGvl5/LBXI0bWxXaddPMZXiCtzZTnrL8dIXos0fbFifs5nHi59c3nErFLGAWEP6w== X-Received: by 10.84.236.76 with SMTP id h12mr1768173pln.173.1485928517677; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:55:17 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from calancha-pc ([103.5.140.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d124sm45919578pga.30.2017.01.31.21.55.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:55:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211828 Archived-At: --8323329-315051154-1485928515=:7008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 31 Jan 2017, Philipp Stephani wrote: > Jordon Biondo schrieb am Mo., 30. Jan. 2017 um 19:39 Uhr: > Are maintainers and users still opposed to this change? If not I'd be happy to update the patch from the previous thread. > > > As a user, I'm still opposed to this change. I don't think consistency is important enough in this case to justify the "worse" > signature. Why not to let people decide by themselves what is a better/worse signature? Considering the opinions on this thread it's clear that better/worse are relative concepts here. --8323329-315051154-1485928515=:7008--