From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: M-p in diff-mode jumps too far Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:54:28 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: References: <87a8aydxe4.fsf@gmail.com> <3c2e407b-8ba2-1791-15e6-a0be6dac2897@yandex.ru> <87fuknzem8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87d1frzcil.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484290528 30641 195.159.176.226 (13 Jan 2017 06:55:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:55:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Cc: Tino Calancha To: 25105@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 13 07:55:24 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvlW-0006G8-Ku for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:55:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39428 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvlZ-0004aX-Ml for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvlR-0004ZN-RA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvlO-0005Lh-Mr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvlO-0005LU-K2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvlO-00074k-98 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.148429047927159 (code B ref 25105); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2017 06:54:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvl1-00073y-3I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:54:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-f196.google.com ([209.85.192.196]:33723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cRvl0-00073m-1g for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 01:54:38 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-f196.google.com with SMTP id 127so7001165pfg.0 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:54:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=3wXF/ItGsoY/SkOjDsOo0Ez4wgMxWdUPRENeQ9Q6db4=; b=CXIchjuTevL8Gbddnbnz6NTpDWG51YHKYlyqxtUPTqBvnoGhmyjoy3kX1s4LGnQ8+7 EQAl6QqpCgh8f9zOYVpqdySW+iiNPPHKGgnB6HAv/KEN6fRINCsn+nnlQKJfiJng8DQH 9ojafuhYRGTmIaQGoEQxqOEN/0nNxD/FWC3wFTVpFqu79EG1yY/jROsi8wqGYn/XFwdX yExluxHf6yY/QU1Zk/6UeotLsAOZev1fECU1EVOdDhslDg5RsazIevw5XX50L23gwPMR TMk23Dzb7r+MzX1CCjegWvVc+WsASdUQhhx8eduGmpK0PPxhWRadlcb1wfhc4fjeMfZq qZdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=3wXF/ItGsoY/SkOjDsOo0Ez4wgMxWdUPRENeQ9Q6db4=; b=N3qknP9FuovzuRhuzmw71FTw+fFISIV883FPV39nIbhHKuCIey4jVWlE6r/HWDUpxt KPapTG9GMlYEcUcWYzwNx1khTfJ9ABv5sTTjWBRuP9uBIgm3Lz5RgnGLIg4w45BfdLS3 euqSdxsaPvmSd/NswiPELBxGL/cVvpI2olOBwKO8puGNeAilrtHSBfeyDwKIMVuOx/NO b/X7rwf461tXu2tTwxZjGnbPt70y/qLTmC4EQkiQL2cNLR7wycRpy2aRgdHUO3eGCKlq xHSq/w4wqHs9/LFQiM7iXBj/jaZ7XhKoD6NgwtlvrpYF9VRj8ca3S3ligDcnYfQYYKdO NYPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKDOZTw3sR7gkjTltiJyL8Kd0ttym9OAZfLd4ioLiXz3IReYgek4fZpo9L16Vn4hQ== X-Received: by 10.84.225.148 with SMTP id u20mr26883276plj.93.1484290471357; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:54:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (217.225.128.101.dy.bbexcite.jp. [101.128.225.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 78sm26268966pfj.23.2017.01.12.22.54.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:54:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc In-Reply-To: <87d1frzcil.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128057 Archived-At: On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > Tino Calancha writes: > >>> >>> I merged the bugs, and dropped #25400 from the cc list, because I'm >>> getting duplicate emails everytime. >> Thank you. Sorry for the duplicated e-mails :-( > > Hmm, I'm still getting duplicates. Maybe I shouldn't have merged? Oh well. Could be because i answered the e-mail to you and CC to Bug#25105? If you are registered to that bug you might get 2 e-mails. >>> I think the commit summary could be a bit friendlier, otherwise it looks >>> good to me. >> Thanks. I agree: if i read my own commit after some months, probably >> i will not fully understand it. >> I propose following more verbose one: >> >> Fix Bug#17544 > > I was thinking more about this summary line. And maybe add some higher > level explanation before the ChangeLog entry about the problems being > solved? How about copy verbatim the comentary from Dima in 2c8a7e5? He explained very clearly the problem, and i am solving the same thing. Mention to the regressions should must appear in the previous commit, where i do the actual revert.